1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1360-1385(99)01472-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root gravitropism: a complex response to a simple stimulus?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…studies have already established its presence and some of its characteristics (Okada and Shimura, 1990;Buer et al, 2000;Migliaccio and Piconese, 2001)-but rather to explore its evolution in time. Information of the kind provided by this study is critical if we are to properly parse the different physical forces involved in root waving, as well as interpret and predict the effects of relevant genetic lesions in auxin or cell wall biochemistry (Marinelli et al, 1997;Mullen et al, 1998b;Rosen et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussion the Potential Importance Of Root-gel Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…studies have already established its presence and some of its characteristics (Okada and Shimura, 1990;Buer et al, 2000;Migliaccio and Piconese, 2001)-but rather to explore its evolution in time. Information of the kind provided by this study is critical if we are to properly parse the different physical forces involved in root waving, as well as interpret and predict the effects of relevant genetic lesions in auxin or cell wall biochemistry (Marinelli et al, 1997;Mullen et al, 1998b;Rosen et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussion the Potential Importance Of Root-gel Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And why at 0°, in the absence of any effectual lateral gravitropic bias, does the root not simply meander? While the overall downward trajectory of the root is clearly a gravitropic effect, as corroborated by studies of auxin-deficient or gravitropism-impaired mutants (Okada and Shimura, 1990;Simmons et al, 1995a;Rutherford and Masson, 1996;Mullen et al, 1998b;Rosen et al, 1999;Migliaccio and Piconese, 2001;Massa and Gilroy, 2003), why the root should turn at all-that is, what causes root tip deflection?-is still debated. A variety of deflecting forces have been proposed, including thigmotropism (Okada and Shimura, 1990), circumnutation (Simmons et al, 1995b;Rutherford and Masson, 1996;Migliaccio and Piconese, 2001), and, as mentioned above, the coupling that occasionally existed between root twisting, coiling and slanting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plastid differentiation to amyloplasts in columella cells has also been well described. In these cells, there is a progressive accumulation of apparently non-polarized starch containing organelles to the formation of basally-located amyloplasts (Blancaflor et al, 1998;Rosen et al, 1999;Van Den Berg et al, 1997;Wildwater et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amyloplasts are found in specialized cells, such as the starch parenchyma surrounding the vascular tissue in plant shoots and grass pulvini, and in the columella of the root cap (Sack, 1991;Chen et al, 1999;Rosen et al, 1999;Perrin et al, 2005). Upon reorientation of a plant shoot or root, the settling of amyloplasts, or the pressure exerted by protoplast settlement (Staves, 1997), is thought to trigger intra-and intercellular signaling, initiating downstream metabolic changes, including a lateral redistribution of auxin, leading to an asymmetric growth response (Lomax et al, 1995;Muday and DeLong, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%