2000
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2000.403765x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root Morphology and Its Relationship with Nitrate Uptake in Kentucky Bluegrass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A wide intra-specific genetic variability was observed in sugar beet for root morphological and physiological traits in agreement with those found in Poa pratensis L. by Sullivan et al (2000), in Triticum aestivum L. by Manschadi et al (2008) and reviewed by Lynch (2007). Genetic variability is a prerequisite for the improvement of plant adaptation to the wide fluctuations of nutrient concentration that take place in the rhizosphere and affect crop yield (Lynch and Beebe 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…A wide intra-specific genetic variability was observed in sugar beet for root morphological and physiological traits in agreement with those found in Poa pratensis L. by Sullivan et al (2000), in Triticum aestivum L. by Manschadi et al (2008) and reviewed by Lynch (2007). Genetic variability is a prerequisite for the improvement of plant adaptation to the wide fluctuations of nutrient concentration that take place in the rhizosphere and affect crop yield (Lynch and Beebe 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…As root growth and maintenance are energetically costly, root architecture is a lever to optimize the balance between nitrogen absorption ability and metabolic cost (Lynch 2014). From this perspective, increasing the root surface by increasing fine root density has been considered as one possible strategy in other crops (White et al 2013) such as maize (Wiesler and Horst 1994), faba beans (Kage 1997), and Kentucky bluegrass (Sullivan et al 2000).…”
Section: Nitrogen Uptake Efficiency Must Be Improved To Maintain a Himentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The root in different diameters was great differences in capacity for nutrient uptake, stronger in fine roots than coarse roots [12]. The fine root length was the largest proportion in the total root length, but decreased in fine root, middle Note: *represent significant differences for the same genotype between K deficiency and CK at 5% level.…”
Section: Root Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher root activity could permit crops to acquire largely nutrient from soil, especially under abiotic stress. The root in different diameters was great differences in capacity for nutrient uptake, stronger in fine roots than coarse roots [12]. Various nutrient elements in plants were interrelationship with potassium, such as N, P, Na and Ca, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%