1977
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a085411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root-Shoot Interactions in Peach: The Function of the Root

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…McConnaughay & Bazzaz (1991) found that one species, Setaria faberii , suffered a reduction in reproduction and a delay in flowering time while the other, Abutilon theophrasti , displayed a relative increase in reproductive tissue when grown in isolation in larger rooting volumes. Both of these species had complex interactions with co‐existing species (including each other) and so these responses to rooting volume may have very different consequences in the field (Raynal & Bazzaz 1975; Wieland & Bazzaz 1975; Richards & Rowe 1977a,b; Carmi & Heuer 1981; Hameed et al . 1987; Facelli & Pickett 1991; Thomas & Strain 1991; Carmi 1993; Liu & Latimer 1995; Kharkina et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…McConnaughay & Bazzaz (1991) found that one species, Setaria faberii , suffered a reduction in reproduction and a delay in flowering time while the other, Abutilon theophrasti , displayed a relative increase in reproductive tissue when grown in isolation in larger rooting volumes. Both of these species had complex interactions with co‐existing species (including each other) and so these responses to rooting volume may have very different consequences in the field (Raynal & Bazzaz 1975; Wieland & Bazzaz 1975; Richards & Rowe 1977a,b; Carmi & Heuer 1981; Hameed et al . 1987; Facelli & Pickett 1991; Thomas & Strain 1991; Carmi 1993; Liu & Latimer 1995; Kharkina et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1999; Matthes‐Sears & Larson 1999; Friedman & Waller 1983; LaBarge & Kremer 1989). A large number of studies involving crop plants generally show a correlated reduction in growth with reduced soil volume but they focus on just shoot biomass production, the production of starch, hormones, N‐amino compounds or stress responses and not the ultimate effect on seedset (Richards & Rowe 1977a,b; Carmi & Heuer 1981; Hameed et al . 1987; Thomas & Strain 1991; Carmi 1993; Liu & Latimer 1995; Kharkina et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Close-proximity planting therefore suppressed the rooting system to a greater extent than the topgrowth. In view of the fact that restricting the rooting system reduces cytokinin and gibberellin production (Richards, 1986), and limits water and mineral uptake (Richards & Rowe, 1977), the observed planting density-induced differences in DM partitioning between topgrowth and rooting system were surprisingly large.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Tworkoski et al (2001) showed that with increasing N the number of stolons and ramets increased. Plant roots can proliferate when they encounter soil enriched in nitrogen (Atkinson, 1974;Daw et al, 1999;Zhang and Forde, 1998) and cytokinin produced from growing root tips exerts control over shoot growth (Richards and Rowe, 1977). It is possible that higher cytokinin resulting from root growth in areas of greater fertility could stimulate growth of new runners (Tworkoski et al, 2001).…”
Section: Vegetative Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%