2014
DOI: 10.14247/lti.16.2_71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root Strength Measurements of Vetiver and Ruzi Grasses

Abstract: This paper aims to study effect of roots of vegetation on the stability of soil along slopes and also soil erosion. The effects of root reinforcement depend on the morphological characteristics of the root system, the tensile strength of grass roots, and the spatial distribution of the roots in the soil. The experiments were carried out to evaluate the root tensile strength of two different grasses namely: Vetiver and Ruzi grasses, by conducting the laboratory tensile tests and field direct shear tests. For ea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The root reinforcement of highland species obtained in the present study (4.9 kPa) was lower than that reported by Eab et al (2015) (6.8 kPa). The lowland roots in this study provided more reinforcement (4.4 kPa) to soil than those in the study of Teerawattanasuk et al (2014) (3.58 kPa) and Mickovski & Van Beek (2009) (2.7 kPa). These differences could be partially explained by the variations in soil conditions and root age among these studies and could cause the biomechanical properties and reinforcement of roots to vary (Mickovski & Van Beek, 2009).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…The root reinforcement of highland species obtained in the present study (4.9 kPa) was lower than that reported by Eab et al (2015) (6.8 kPa). The lowland roots in this study provided more reinforcement (4.4 kPa) to soil than those in the study of Teerawattanasuk et al (2014) (3.58 kPa) and Mickovski & Van Beek (2009) (2.7 kPa). These differences could be partially explained by the variations in soil conditions and root age among these studies and could cause the biomechanical properties and reinforcement of roots to vary (Mickovski & Van Beek, 2009).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…e relationship can be represented by both power law equation [60] and second-order polynomials [39]. e power law equation was applied since this equation represents the best fit line for the data and has been widely reported by many previous researches [18,54,61]. As shown in Figure 1, the relationship represented by the power law equation for both of the studied species was very closely presented due to the small variation in diameter of root.…”
Section: Tensile Force-root Diameter Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A significant increase in root length and root biomass that were observed in PPl species can contribute to a higher soil-root interaction. Subsequently, a great soil-root interaction will result in higher soil reinforcement that increases the shear strength of soil slope [2,54]. Root biomass increases the preferential path for the subsurface runoff, thus improving the soil shear strength and reducing slope failure [4].…”
Section: Root Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In leaves, toughness per density makes a greater contribution to mechanical strength than lamina thickness and tissue density combined (Onoda et al, 2011), and the same may be true for root diameter and density. In both grasses and trees, the tensile strength of roots decreases with root diameter (i.e., thinner roots are stronger) and this can be explained partly by a scaling effect commonly seen in fracture mechanics and partly by the higher cellulose concentrations observed in fine roots (Genet et al, 2005; Teerawattanasuk et al, 2014). …”
Section: Get Tough—physical Defensesmentioning
confidence: 99%