2021
DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rooting Out Genetic Structure of Invasive Wild Pigs in Texas

Abstract: Invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa), also called feral swine or wild hogs, are recognized as among the most destructive invasive species in the world. Throughout the United States, invasive wild pigs have expanded rapidly over the past 40 years with populations now established in 38 states. Of the estimated 6.9 million wild pigs distributed throughout the United States, Texas supports approximately 40% of the population and similarly bears disproportionate ecological and economic costs. Genetic analyses are an eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such methods may often involve complex laboratory protocols, are constrained to sequencing markers that occur near restriction sites, and can suffer from lack of consistency between samples and studies due to variation in sample DNA degradation, sequencing batch artefacts, and null alleles due to polymorphisms at cut sites [ 11 , 12 ], thereby reducing the final number of useable markers in the final dataset. Still another option is commercial array-based genotyping platforms, which offer rapid and highly robust genotyping at 10,000s to 100,000s of SNPs with minimal lab preparation, and which has seen some recent applications in invasive wildlife research contexts [ 13 ]. However, due to the high costs of development, these arrays are typically restricted to laboratory model organisms or domesticated species, or closely related taxa [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such methods may often involve complex laboratory protocols, are constrained to sequencing markers that occur near restriction sites, and can suffer from lack of consistency between samples and studies due to variation in sample DNA degradation, sequencing batch artefacts, and null alleles due to polymorphisms at cut sites [ 11 , 12 ], thereby reducing the final number of useable markers in the final dataset. Still another option is commercial array-based genotyping platforms, which offer rapid and highly robust genotyping at 10,000s to 100,000s of SNPs with minimal lab preparation, and which has seen some recent applications in invasive wildlife research contexts [ 13 ]. However, due to the high costs of development, these arrays are typically restricted to laboratory model organisms or domesticated species, or closely related taxa [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%