2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2005.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rosetta Lander—Philae: Implications of an alternative mission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The change of the target comet has a major impact on the Philae landing safety, since the expected touchdown velocity is higher than in the case of 46P/Wirtanen, due to the much larger size of P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko (Lamy et al, 2003). Some hardware changes have been implemented, to increase robustness at touch-down (Ulamec et al, 2006). However, the safe landing remains highly sensitive to actual nucleus properties, largely unknown at this time.…”
Section: Philae Mission Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The change of the target comet has a major impact on the Philae landing safety, since the expected touchdown velocity is higher than in the case of 46P/Wirtanen, due to the much larger size of P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko (Lamy et al, 2003). Some hardware changes have been implemented, to increase robustness at touch-down (Ulamec et al, 2006). However, the safe landing remains highly sensitive to actual nucleus properties, largely unknown at this time.…”
Section: Philae Mission Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orbital and physical parameters also play an important role in the choice of a mission target. In the next sections, we discuss the rationales behind choosing Wilson-Harrington as the next small body missions, and make comparisons between 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko 4) , the target of the Rosetta mission launched by the European Space Agency (ESA), the target of the Hayabusa Follow-on mission, 1999 JU3, and Itokawa visited by Hayabusa in 2005. We also investigate the dynamics close to Wilson-Harrington and on the surface to provide the first assessment of this environment and to derive and discuss approach and proximity operation strategies useful for a sample return mission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, in order to achieve the minimum level of risk, the spacecraft would need to meet the cometary target beyond the solar system snow line, around 4 or 5 AU. The current ESA mission Rosetta with the Philae lander going to 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko has implemented this approach 4) .…”
Section: Rationales For Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, practical reality coupled with some changes in support from the relevant space agencies ultimately gave rise to the present mission. A complete overview of this can be found in [14] and some of the challenges posed by a launcher failure that preceded Rosetta are described in [15]. In principle, Rosetta is a two-part spacecraft consisting of the main 'orbiter' craft and a 100 kg 'lander' known as Philae [16].…”
Section: The Rosetta Space Missionmentioning
confidence: 99%