2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rosetta science operations in support of the Philae mission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RSGS classified three different trajectory versions: first the approximate trajectories created by ROVIZ together with a file known as the TRAjectory request at Long term planning (TRAL), second the Long Term Planning (LTP) cycle trajectories provided by the Flight Dynamics team -both these cases were usually sliced by Medium Term Planning (MTP) cycles in the 3dtool -and third the final Very Short Term Planning (VSTP) cycle trajectories, which also comprise the reconstructed trajectory for the past. 7 For each trajectory, there are several products available: the SPICE kernels which have been used to generate the content, a link to 3D visualizations, a link to 2D plots and raw data files containing the computed (time-resolved) parameters. …”
Section: Visual Front-endmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RSGS classified three different trajectory versions: first the approximate trajectories created by ROVIZ together with a file known as the TRAjectory request at Long term planning (TRAL), second the Long Term Planning (LTP) cycle trajectories provided by the Flight Dynamics team -both these cases were usually sliced by Medium Term Planning (MTP) cycles in the 3dtool -and third the final Very Short Term Planning (VSTP) cycle trajectories, which also comprise the reconstructed trajectory for the past. 7 For each trajectory, there are several products available: the SPICE kernels which have been used to generate the content, a link to 3D visualizations, a link to 2D plots and raw data files containing the computed (time-resolved) parameters. …”
Section: Visual Front-endmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was a dynamic process and evolved over time as more knowledge of the Philae status was gained with further contacts, and subsequent on-ground analyses 7 .…”
Section: Evolution Of New Planning Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is done via delivery of the Lander Selected Event File (LSEV) back to the RSGS containing only those lander -orbiter communication windows, lander -orbiter combined observations and CONSERT observations that shall be supported by Philae and by the subsequently delivered (by LCC) final POR format commanding. The CONSERT team are also actively involved at each step of the process, with full visibility of the events being exchanged 7 .…”
Section: The Rsgs-lgs Planning Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the pre-landing phase, the SGS ran the process explained above for only those observations defined as Operational [12] whereby they contributed science to support the landing site selection. If a science result was expected to feed into the landing site selection, then steps needed to be taken to see if a replan was at all feasible i.e.…”
Section: Feeding Qlr Back To the Uplink Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%