1967
DOI: 10.2307/304886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rossiia i Evropa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two monographs by Mahrug Tagieva, published in 2019, are devoted to questions of the reception of the Russian writer's work. The interest in Dostoevsky was justified not only by the profound psychologism and religious content of his prose, the interesting judgments of the author and his characters on the fate of Russia, but also by the controversial statements about the place and role of his homeland in Europe, about the special position of Russia between Europe and Asia, largely in tune with the postulates and thoughts of philosopher N. Danilevsky, author of "Russia and Europe" [4], in which he didn't single out Turks as a separate cultural-historical type, but listed them among the peoples-destroyers of world civilizations. In our opinion, Dostoevsky's reasoning (enticing idea of "all-Slavic unity" and "acquiring Constanti-nople", along with the Marmara Sea coast and access to the Mediterranean) does not stem from the real historical relations between Russia and the Turkic world, but embodies the Russian Orthodox Church's thesis of returning Istanbul and is in close contact with Peter the Great's will be regarding this issue.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two monographs by Mahrug Tagieva, published in 2019, are devoted to questions of the reception of the Russian writer's work. The interest in Dostoevsky was justified not only by the profound psychologism and religious content of his prose, the interesting judgments of the author and his characters on the fate of Russia, but also by the controversial statements about the place and role of his homeland in Europe, about the special position of Russia between Europe and Asia, largely in tune with the postulates and thoughts of philosopher N. Danilevsky, author of "Russia and Europe" [4], in which he didn't single out Turks as a separate cultural-historical type, but listed them among the peoples-destroyers of world civilizations. In our opinion, Dostoevsky's reasoning (enticing idea of "all-Slavic unity" and "acquiring Constanti-nople", along with the Marmara Sea coast and access to the Mediterranean) does not stem from the real historical relations between Russia and the Turkic world, but embodies the Russian Orthodox Church's thesis of returning Istanbul and is in close contact with Peter the Great's will be regarding this issue.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%