1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1994.tb00291.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rostrocaudal Subregional Differences in the Response of Enkephalin, Dynorphin and Substance P Synthesis in Rat Nucleus Accumbens to Dopamine Depletion

Abstract: Quantitative in situ hybridization histochemistry was used to examine the effects of unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the ascending dopaminergic fibres on levels of mRNA encoding the neuropeptides enkephalin, dynorphin and substance P in subregions of the nucleus accumbens. The nucleus accumbens was divided into quadrants and changes in mRNA were measured along the rostrocaudal extent of the nucleus. Two weeks after the lesion an increase was found in enkephalin mRNA in the lesioned side compared to the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been no other published systematic studies of the distribution of PPD mRNA in the rat brain. However, there have been a number of studies that described the distribution PPD mRNA-synthesizing perikarya in major subdivisions or localized regions of the rat brain (Young et al, 1986;Ruda et al, 1988;AlvarezBolado et al, 1990;Meister et al, 1990;Rutherfurd and Gundlach, 1993;Griffond et al, 1994;Voorn et al, 1994). The results of these anatomically restricted studies have usually been similar to our observations.…”
Section: Distribution Of the Expression Of The Preprodynorphin Genesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…There have been no other published systematic studies of the distribution of PPD mRNA in the rat brain. However, there have been a number of studies that described the distribution PPD mRNA-synthesizing perikarya in major subdivisions or localized regions of the rat brain (Young et al, 1986;Ruda et al, 1988;AlvarezBolado et al, 1990;Meister et al, 1990;Rutherfurd and Gundlach, 1993;Griffond et al, 1994;Voorn et al, 1994). The results of these anatomically restricted studies have usually been similar to our observations.…”
Section: Distribution Of the Expression Of The Preprodynorphin Genesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Conspicuous differences in the effect of cholecystokinin or dopaminergic receptor stimulation have been described between the rostral and the caudal nucleus accumbens, supporting the existence of anatomical and functional differences between these regions (Vaccarino and Rankin, 1989;Essman et al, 1993;Voorn et al, 1994). Local infusions of 5-HT into the nucleus accumbens decrease locomotor activity (Jones et al, 1981); however, it is unknown whether or not regional differences in sensitivity to serotonergic agents occur within the nucleus accumbens.…”
Section: Heterogeneous Distribution Of 5-ht 2c Receptor Mrna In the Smentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Rostral versus caudal portions of the accumbens shell differ in cell morphology, connectivity, and neurochemical organization (Herkenham et al, 1984;Phillipson and Griffiths, 1985;Oades and Halliday, 1987;Zahm and Brog, 1992;Brog et al, 1993;Groenewegen et al, 1993;Zahm and Heimer, 1993;Voorn et al, 1994;Gorelova and Yang, 1997;Usuda et al, 1998). Although the entire shell receives afferent projections from the prefrontal cortex, subiculum, amygdala, ventral pallidum, lateral hypothalamus, ventral tegmental area, etc., the rostral shell receives denser innervation from the subiculum and basolateral amygdala, whereas the caudal shell receives sparser projections from those structures (Phillipson and Griffiths, 1985;Brog et al, 1993).…”
Section: Neurobiological Bases Of Rostrocaudal Shell Segregation Of Amentioning
confidence: 99%