2021
DOI: 10.3390/polym13071020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotating Bending Fatigue Analysis of Printed Specimens from Assorted Polymer Materials

Abstract: Fused filament fabrication (FFF), as a form of additive manufacturing (AM), in recent years, has become a popular method to manufacture prototypes, as well as functional parts. FFF is an extrusion process, commonly known as 3D printing, where the object is built by depositing melted material layer by layer. The most common materials, i.e., the materials that are most widely used, are polylactic acid (PLA), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and acrylonitrile styrene acrylate (ASA). Although there are lot of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus of his work is to analyse the influence of material extrusion rates and line widths on GPLA to provide an in-depth understanding of the trade-offs that can be made while manufacturing parts using the FFF process specifically in terms of dimensional accuracy, surface texture, hardness, and flexural strength. These are common issues associated with FFF-printed parts [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]32,34,[46][47][48][49][50][51]. It has been established through the results in this work that small line widths provide more accuracy with longer print times whereas large line widths offer more stability with shorter printing times.…”
Section: Materials Quality Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The focus of his work is to analyse the influence of material extrusion rates and line widths on GPLA to provide an in-depth understanding of the trade-offs that can be made while manufacturing parts using the FFF process specifically in terms of dimensional accuracy, surface texture, hardness, and flexural strength. These are common issues associated with FFF-printed parts [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]32,34,[46][47][48][49][50][51]. It has been established through the results in this work that small line widths provide more accuracy with longer print times whereas large line widths offer more stability with shorter printing times.…”
Section: Materials Quality Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The FFF process has several notable advantages such as ease of operation, wide variety of materials, and cost-effectiveness [9][10][11][12]. PLA, ABS, and ASA are examples of commonly used thermoplastics for FFF and they have been widely researched over the years [13][14][15][16][17][18] for the optimization of their processing parameters to achieve properties. For example, Aslani et al [19] investigated the effects of extraction temperature and wall thickness on the dimensional accuracy and surface roughness of FFF-printed PLA parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous methods have been used so far to test the mechanical properties of printed materials, such as the Charpy test [ 43 ] or rotating bending fatigue analysis [ 44 ]; in this work, uniaxial tensile testing is utilized. Test specimens according to the ISO 527-2 standard ( Figure 5 ), with a square cross-section, were modeled in the SOLIDWORKS software package, then exported in .stl format suitable for 3D printing.…”
Section: Additive Manufacturing Considerations and Experimental Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCL, which is the same as PLA metabolites, is also favored due to its excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability. It has good flexibility and processability, and is easy to form film, although its mechanical strength is slightly insufficient ( Zhai et al, 2017 ; Brčić et al, 2021 ). PLGA is formed by the polymerization of two kinds of monomers including PLA.…”
Section: Current Situation and Future Prospects Of Ua Nanoformulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%