1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf01868644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotation of cells in an alternating electric field theory and experimental proof

Abstract: Protoplasts of Avena sativa rotate in an alternating electric field provided that at least two cells are located close to each other. An optimum frequency range (20 to 30 kHz) exists where rotation of all cells exposed to the field is observed. Below and above this frequency range, rotation of some cells is only occasionally observed. The angular velocity of rotation depends on the square of the electric field strength. At field strengths above the value leading to electrical breakdown of the cell membrane, ro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
64
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
9
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…28 To study migration, the cells on the electrodes were removed using a scalpel. Four cuts were made around the cells, and the rectangular cell layer was then gently removed using a pair of tweezers.…”
Section: Cell Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 To study migration, the cells on the electrodes were removed using a scalpel. Four cuts were made around the cells, and the rectangular cell layer was then gently removed using a pair of tweezers.…”
Section: Cell Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include microscopic particle alignment (i.e., the pearl chain effect; Ref. 6) and cell rotation (7,8). With pulsed electric fields of 10 3 V/cm and 100-ms pulse length, reversible pore formation appears in the cell membrane, a phenomenon usually called electroporation (9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these indications of potential oncological applications of CRet, the current knowledge about the cellular response to this and other radiofrequency electrothermal therapies is still very poor. In fact, only a few, minor in vitro effects have been described for fields at frequencies ≥0.1 MHz (11)(12)(13). Consequently, it has been generally assumed that such fields have no relevant biological effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%