1981
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.23.2926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotational cross sections and rate coefficients fore-CO ande-HCN collisions under interstellar conditions

Abstract: Rotational cross sections and rate coefficients for e-CO and e-HCN collisions have been calculated in the energy range relevant to dark interstellar clouds by using the close-coupling method. Gordon's technique has been used for solving the coupled Schrodinger equations. Initial rotational levels j = 0, 1, and 2 of CO and HCN have been considered. The rotational cross sections have been calculated in the energy range 0.0006 to 0.1 eV and the rate coefficients in the temperature range 5-100 K. The cross section… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Fig. 2, we compare our integral cross‐sections with those of Jain & Norcross (1985) and Saha et al (1981). Excellent agreement is observed down to 0.01 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In Fig. 2, we compare our integral cross‐sections with those of Jain & Norcross (1985) and Saha et al (1981). Excellent agreement is observed down to 0.01 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“… Integral cross‐sections for rotationally inelastic scattering of electrons by HCN as a function of electron energy. The lozenges and stars denote the results of Saha et al (1981) and Jain & Norcross (1985), respectively. The present calculations are given by the solid thick lines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…16 we have plotted our total cross sections for the dipole (0~1 and 1~2) and quadrupole (0~2) al- There are significant differences between our ESEP results and the SMEP calculations of Saha et al. [32]. The calculations of Saha used a simple repulsive wall for the inner region, and were carried out in the laboratory frame, as were those of Crawford and Dalgarno [24] and Chandra [30].…”
Section: Rotational Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 93%