2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotational excitation of bridges supported on pile groups in soft or liquefiable soil deposits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a matter of fact, both the structures were founded on mono-piles, with the exception of the wall belonging to the dual system, whose foundation was a 3 × 1 group of piles. For this particular piles' layout (mono-piles and/or very small pile groups) the rocking motion induced by kinematic interaction may be important, as outlined also by Sextos et al 14 For common piles' layouts the effect of the rocking component of the foundation motion is instead negligible 15 and SFSI usually leads to a reduction of the seismic demand. This is also consistent with common expectations encoded in design documents such as Eurocode EN-1998-5, 16 claiming that 'for the majority of common building structures, the effects of soil-structure-interaction tend to be beneficial, since they reduce the bending moment and shear forces in the various member of the superstructure'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As a matter of fact, both the structures were founded on mono-piles, with the exception of the wall belonging to the dual system, whose foundation was a 3 × 1 group of piles. For this particular piles' layout (mono-piles and/or very small pile groups) the rocking motion induced by kinematic interaction may be important, as outlined also by Sextos et al 14 For common piles' layouts the effect of the rocking component of the foundation motion is instead negligible 15 and SFSI usually leads to a reduction of the seismic demand. This is also consistent with common expectations encoded in design documents such as Eurocode EN-1998-5, 16 claiming that 'for the majority of common building structures, the effects of soil-structure-interaction tend to be beneficial, since they reduce the bending moment and shear forces in the various member of the superstructure'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The pile-group foundation dynamic behavior has been thoroughly investigated in the past [34][35][36][37][38]; hence, the impedance matrix is generated analytically through the formulation proposed by Gazetas and Makris in [37,38] as implemented by the software ASING [39]. As the selected closed form solution has been evaluated in the past [37,38] through comparison with rigorous solution results of pile-group impedance functions, an additional verification is not included within this study.…”
Section: Extraction Of the Soil-foundation Domain Dynamic Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tomisawa and Kimura [34] proposed new techniques to improve seismic performance of the pile foundation for long life bridges. e seismic excitation on the pile foundation was also considered in some studies [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%