Rotational periods and evolutionary models for subgiant stars observed by CoRoT

Abstract

Context. We present rotation period measurements for subgiants observed by CoRoT. Interpreting the modulation of stellar light that is caused by star-spots on the time scale of the rotational period depends on knowing the fundamental stellar parameters. Aims. Constraints on the angular momentum distribution can be extracted from the true stellar rotational period. By using models with an internal angular momentum distribution and comparing these with measurements of rotation periods of subgiant stars we investigate the agreement between theoretical predictions and observational results. With this comparison we can also reduce the global stellar parameter space compatible with the rotational period measurements from subgiant light curves. We can prove that an evolution assuming solid body rotation is incompatible with the direct measurement of the rotational periods of subgiant stars. Methods. Measuring the rotation periods relies on two different periodogram procedures, the Lomb-Scargle algorithm and the Plavchan periodogram. Angular momentum evolution models were computed to give us the expected rotation periods for subgiants, which we compared with measured rotational periods. Results. We find evidence of a sinusoidal signal that is compatible in terms of both phase and amplitude with rotational modulation. Rotation periods were directly measured from light curves for 30 subgiant stars and indicate a range of 30 to 100 d for their rotational periods. Conclusions. Our models reproduce the rotational periods obtained from CoRoT light curves. These new measurements of rotation periods and stellar models probe the non-rigid rotation of subgiant stars.

Rotating Stars from Kepler Observed with Gaia DR2

“…These are likely subgiant stars, which no longer follow the main sequence stars spin-down evolution (e.g. do Nascimento et al 2012;van Saders & Pinsonneault 2013). Since Davenport (2017) found subgiants could obscure the rotation period bimodality for G dwarfs, these must be excluded from our analysis, but we encourage future studies to explore the wealth of angular momentum evolution data from these post-main sequence objects.…”

Weighing in on the masses of retired A stars with asteroseismology: K2 observations of the exoplanet-host star HD 212771

“…This is often done following a gridbased approach, whereby observables are matched to well-sampled grids of stellar evolutionary tracks (e.g., Stello et al 2009;Basu et al 2010Basu et al , 2012Chaplin et al 2011;Creevey et al 2012). Here, we employ the Bayesian code param (da Silva et al 2006;Rodrigues et al 2014Rodrigues et al , 2017. Based on a given set of observables, the code first computes the probability density functions (PDFs) for the stellar mass, M, radius, R, age, t, surface gravity, log g, and mean density, log(ρ/ρ ⊙ ), as well as for the absolute magnitudes in a number of widely used bandpasses.…”

Planets Around Low-Mass Stars (Palms). V. Age-Dating Low-Mass Companions to Members and Interlopers of Young Moving Groups

“…This is above the main sequence even if the primary is an equal-flux binary and is most consistent with evolved stars on the subgiant branch. Pojmanski (1997) and Richards et al (2012) measure a rotation rate of 7.56 days for 2MASS J06475229-2523304 A, which is somewhat faster than the typical rotation period for subgiants of ∼10-100 days (do Nascimento et al 2012;van Saders & Pinsonneault 2013). However, the fast rotation period can be explained by a tidally locked short-period companion (e.g., Ryan & Deliyannis 1995), which can also account for its RV variations, Hα emission, and X-ray activity.…”