2003
DOI: 10.1177/03635465030310040301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotator Cuff Repair

Abstract: The initial fixation strength of our double-layer repair exceeds that of isolated single-layer repairs with either suture anchors or transosseous tunnels.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent biomechanical studies have demonstrated that the elements for successful repair of a rotator cuff tear are achievement of strong fixation [1921], a high interface pressure, a wide interface area between the tendon and the bone [22, 23], and minimization of stress concentration inside the tendon [7, 24]. Some new suture techniques allowing achievement of all of these elements have been devised [1, 7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent biomechanical studies have demonstrated that the elements for successful repair of a rotator cuff tear are achievement of strong fixation [1921], a high interface pressure, a wide interface area between the tendon and the bone [22, 23], and minimization of stress concentration inside the tendon [7, 24]. Some new suture techniques allowing achievement of all of these elements have been devised [1, 7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several biomechanical studies have evaluated the ultimate load-to-failure of various rotator cuff repair constructs. Waltrip et al 21 used cyclic loading to compare single-row and double-row construct strength. In their study, single-row repair with simple sutures failed after a mean of 1414 cycles as compared with the double-row repair, which failed after a mean of 3694 cycles.…”
Section: Ultimate Load To Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature has demonstrated that single- and double-row repairs are safe and effective. [1135] The purpose of this study, unlike prior biomechanical studies that examined the relative strength double-row cuff repair,[1314161718] was to illustrate the kinematic effects of single- and double-row suture anchor repairs of 2 cm supraspinatus tears on simulated active glenohumeral joint kinematics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomechanical studies have found double-row constructs to be stronger than single-row constructs in both cadaveric[712131415161718] and animal[1920212223] models. In addition, double-row repairs can restore the tendon footprint more accurately[15232425] and are associated with higher rates of tendon healing than single-row repairs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%