2021
DOI: 10.22459/rmcd.2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rote-Meto Comparative Dictionary

Abstract: Acknowledgements vii Abbreviations and symbols ix Speech varieties listed in the dictionary xi † 'Meto' is used when a form is taken from Jonker (1908) who does not specify which variety of Meto his data is from. ROTE-METO COMPARATIVE DICTIONARY xii Speech varieties (with at least four occurrences) in out-comparisons Lect Region Sub-region ISO Glottocode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To proof that a lexeme set was borrowed into tap languages, it must be demonstrably Austronesian; that is, there must be a Proto Austronesian (pan) or Proto Malayo-Polynesian (pmp) reconstructed form that has a similar form and meaning. For this evidence I drew on the etymological database by Blust and Trussel (n.d.), as well as recent historical reconstructions done on daughter stages of pmp that are relevant to the area of Alor Pantar and Timor: Proto Flores-Lembata (pfl) (Fricke 2019), located to the west of Pantar island, and Proto Rote-Meto5 (prm) (Edwards 2021), on Timor.…”
Section: Present Study: Methods and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To proof that a lexeme set was borrowed into tap languages, it must be demonstrably Austronesian; that is, there must be a Proto Austronesian (pan) or Proto Malayo-Polynesian (pmp) reconstructed form that has a similar form and meaning. For this evidence I drew on the etymological database by Blust and Trussel (n.d.), as well as recent historical reconstructions done on daughter stages of pmp that are relevant to the area of Alor Pantar and Timor: Proto Flores-Lembata (pfl) (Fricke 2019), located to the west of Pantar island, and Proto Rote-Meto5 (prm) (Edwards 2021), on Timor.…”
Section: Present Study: Methods and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, the sources present reconstructed pmp forms, or they mention sets of related lexemes that cannot (yet) be reconstructed to a common proto form (indicated with a hashtag #).6 These two types of Proto Flores-Lembata and Proto Rote-Meto forms were used to compare the tap data with. In addition, I occasionally considered lexical data from a group of an languages in central and east Timor that are not grouped under Proto Rote-Meto, but are part of the higher order Timor-Babar subgroup (Edwards 2021), and for which no historical reconstructions are yet available. The diachronic 'baseline' form of the tap languages was determined by considering reconstructed forms for proto tap Holton et al 2012;Holton and Robinson 2017a).…”
Section: Present Study: Methods and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations