2021
DOI: 10.12732/ijam.v34i2.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rothe-Maruyama Difference Scheme for the Stochastic Schr\"{o}dinger Equation

Abstract: In this study, the initial value stochastic Schrödinger type problem in an abstract Hilbert space with the self-adjoint operator is investigated.Rothe-Maruyama method for the numerical solution of this problem is presented. Theorem on the convergence of this difference scheme is established. A numerical example is given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2025
2025
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Euler type finite difference scheme, adapted for stochastic differential equations is known under the name Euler-Maruyama scheme, [20]. The Euler-Maruyama scheme considered here is also implicit and is therefore named as the Rothe-Maruyama scheme as in [29], where u(0) was given which is different from here where u(0) depends on a finite number of future values. Since A is a self adjoint operator, all eigenvalues of A are real numbers.…”
Section: The Rothe-maruyama Time Multipoint Boundary Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Euler type finite difference scheme, adapted for stochastic differential equations is known under the name Euler-Maruyama scheme, [20]. The Euler-Maruyama scheme considered here is also implicit and is therefore named as the Rothe-Maruyama scheme as in [29], where u(0) was given which is different from here where u(0) depends on a finite number of future values. Since A is a self adjoint operator, all eigenvalues of A are real numbers.…”
Section: The Rothe-maruyama Time Multipoint Boundary Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. To prove (4.11) and (4.13), we modify the proof in [29], where the case of 0 ≤ α ≤ 1 and 1 ≤ β ≤ 2 was shown.…”
Section: 14)mentioning
confidence: 99%