2003
DOI: 10.3386/w9413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotten Apples: An Investigation of the Prevalence and Predictors of Teacher Cheating

Abstract: We develop an algorithm for detecting teacher cheating that combines information on unexpected test score fluctuations and suspicious patterns of answers for students in a classroom.Using data from the Chicago Public Schools, we estimate that serious cases of teacher or administrator cheating on standardized tests occur in a minimum of 4-5 percent of elementary school classrooms annually. Moreover, the observed frequency of cheating appears to respond strongly to relatively minor changes in incentives. Our res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
382
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 364 publications
(389 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
382
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As clearly shown in the literature, cheating behaviours are quite common in census based surveys (Jacob and Levitt, 2003). Unfortunately, Italy is not an exception.…”
Section: Data Cleaning: Cheating Detection and Removalmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As clearly shown in the literature, cheating behaviours are quite common in census based surveys (Jacob and Levitt, 2003). Unfortunately, Italy is not an exception.…”
Section: Data Cleaning: Cheating Detection and Removalmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Furthermore, previous studies show that the presence of test-based accountability distorts teacher behavior. For example, Jacob and Levitt (2003) provide evidence of teacher cheating on the Iowa Test of Basic Skills in Chicago elementary schools. Dee et al (2011) also show that teachers wanting to help their students, tend to inflate test scores on New York's high school assessment exams.…”
Section: The Jurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power (1997), Strathern (2000) and Osterloh and Frey (2010) analyze the reactivity of persons when they are subjected to audits, rankings, and other assessments. Jacob and Levitt (2003) show that schools subject to standardized tests give them incentives to cheat, such as "teaching to the test", or excluding weak students from attending when the test takes place, or excluding them from the school altogether. Espeland and Saunders (2007) empirically study the response of American business schools to their rankings undermining their usefulness.…”
Section: Proposition 1: As Soon As the Happiness Index Has Become An mentioning
confidence: 99%