2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00391-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rough approximation of a preference relation by a multi-attribute dominance for deterministic, stochastic and fuzzy decision problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This multi-attribute analysis thus consists of evaluating individually each of a set of projects in terms of the influence of each conditional attribute that could have an influence on success. Secondly, decisional attributes represented by performance indicators as used in the dominance-based rough set approach [12] [13] are added to the model to measure impact of implementation. We have chosen this artificial intelligence tool because it allows "if... then…" type decision rules to be deduced from examples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This multi-attribute analysis thus consists of evaluating individually each of a set of projects in terms of the influence of each conditional attribute that could have an influence on success. Secondly, decisional attributes represented by performance indicators as used in the dominance-based rough set approach [12] [13] are added to the model to measure impact of implementation. We have chosen this artificial intelligence tool because it allows "if... then…" type decision rules to be deduced from examples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, situations do arise, especially in strategic planning problems, when uncertainty is as critical as the issue of conflicting management goals. In such cases, approaches designed for MDMU become necessary, for instance (a) the multi-attribute utility theory, (b) pairwise comparisons of probability distributions, (c) the use of surrogate risk measures (quantiles, variances) as additional decision criteria, (d) models combining fuzzy numbers with the analytic hierarchy process, (e) fuzzy TOPSIS, and (f) the integration of MDMU and scenario planning (SP) (Ben Amor et al 2007;Dominiak 2009;Durbach 2014;Durbach, Stewart 2012;Keeney, Raiffa 1993;Liu et al 2011;Michnik 2013b;Stewart 2005;Triantaphyllou, Lin 1996;Urli, Nadeau 2004;Watkins et al 2000;Xu 2000;Yu 2002;Zaras 2004). (Durbach, Stewart 2012) state that uncertainties become increasingly so complex that the elicitation of measures such as probabilities, belief functions or fuzzy membership functions becomes operationally difficult for DMs to comprehend and virtually impossible to validate.…”
Section: Multicriteria Decision Making With Scenario Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rough Set Theory was originally proposed by [4] before being further developed by [8,10] and others. The proposal of [8] ensures that the principle of dominance is respected and it's called Dominance-based Rough Set Approach (DRSA).…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%