2004
DOI: 10.15388/informatica.2004.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rough Set Approach for Generation of Classification Rules of Breast Cancer Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prediction accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity are some of the evaluation models that are used to estimate the performance of the proposed system. Hassanien and Ali (2004) presented a Rough Set method for generating classification rules. This study showed that the theory of Rough Sets seems to be a useful tool.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity are some of the evaluation models that are used to estimate the performance of the proposed system. Hassanien and Ali (2004) presented a Rough Set method for generating classification rules. This study showed that the theory of Rough Sets seems to be a useful tool.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar and Inbarani (2015b) Classification This paper presents the new automated classification method for electrocardiogram (ECG) arrhythmia using improved bijective soft set theory. Hassanien and Jafar (2004) Classification In this paper, presented a rough set-based system for rules generation. The generated rules are from a set of observed 360 samples of the breast cancer data.…”
Section: Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gupta et al (2011) analyzes the various classification techniques applied to diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer. The author analyse the papers (Sarvestan et al, 2010;Orlando et al, 2010;Abdelaal et al, 2010;Chang and Liou, 2005;Gandhi et al, 2010;Padmavati, 2011;Chul et al, 2001;Hassanien and Jafar, 2004;Sudhir et al, 2006;Jamarani et al, 2005;Abdelghani and Guven, 2006;Choi et al, 2009;Lundin et al, 1999;Street, 1998;Chi et al, 2007;Dursun et al, 2004;Khan et al, 2008) and concludes that any classification method is acceptable for diagnosis. But for the prognosis ANN classification method gives higher accuracy than any other classification methods.…”
Section: Cancer Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%