2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roughness sublayer flows over real urban morphology: A wind tunnel study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifty measurement points were randomly selected in the study area and their CFD simulation results were compared with the wind tunnel test results (Figure 7). The root mean square error (RMSE) of the wind speed ratio between the CFD simulation and the wind tunnel test was found to be 0.02, which is close to the RMSE value of 0.08∼0.24 found in similar validation studies [87], indicating the credibility of the CFD results. Additional information on the wind tunnel test, CFD approach, model set-up and validation can be found in the Supplementary Material (see Supplementary Material: Note S1).…”
Section: Eer Reviewsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Fifty measurement points were randomly selected in the study area and their CFD simulation results were compared with the wind tunnel test results (Figure 7). The root mean square error (RMSE) of the wind speed ratio between the CFD simulation and the wind tunnel test was found to be 0.02, which is close to the RMSE value of 0.08∼0.24 found in similar validation studies [87], indicating the credibility of the CFD results. Additional information on the wind tunnel test, CFD approach, model set-up and validation can be found in the Supplementary Material (see Supplementary Material: Note S1).…”
Section: Eer Reviewsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…(2021); Mo et al. (2021) and therefore not easily accessible by the public. Furthermore, urban geometries were simulated with varying resolutions and differed in how the non‐building urban features were treated, making direct comparisons and reproduction of their results difficult.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, each of the assumptions has its drawbacks. For applications in urban context especially at the nearground level, the log-law wind profile's validity is dubious, as the roughness of urban areas would significantly alter the atmospheric boundary layer's (ABL) layered structure which makes the log-law wind profile less accurate [1,2]. The power-law wind profile is an empirical assumption that describes the ground surface roughness's influence on the wind profile, of which the validity in describing the near-ground wind profile is also dubious.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%