2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-03807-6_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Round Optimal Black-Box “Commit-and-Prove”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As argued in [KOS18], since r is global across all the executions, if w ̸ = w ′ then w + rα ̸ = w ′ + rα with overwhelming probability due to the Schwartz-Zippel lemma. Therefore, if the committed messages are different across the (multiple) executions, then the statement proven by Π AI must be false, and the soundness of Π AI guarantees that the verifier rejects.…”
Section: σ-Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As argued in [KOS18], since r is global across all the executions, if w ̸ = w ′ then w + rα ̸ = w ′ + rα with overwhelming probability due to the Schwartz-Zippel lemma. Therefore, if the committed messages are different across the (multiple) executions, then the statement proven by Π AI must be false, and the soundness of Π AI guarantees that the verifier rejects.…”
Section: σ-Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To make sure that the same message is committed in all these executions, we use a technique proposed by Khurana et al in [KOS18]. Namely, in each execution of Σ, instead of committing to w, we commit to w||r, for some random value r. Then, we use the protocol Π AI to prove that a = w + rα, where α is chosen as part of the challenge, and a is sent in the third round from the prover.…”
Section: σ-Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, x ℓ as the output of a PRG, and remove complexity leveraging in the approach outlined above. It also may be possible to rely on black-box commit-and-prove sigma protocols (e.g., variants of the protocol in [KOS18]) to prove that commitments to pairs of strings share a common offset, thereby making our protocol blackbox and unconditionally secure in the QROM. We leave a formalization and detailed analysis of this approach, and more generally an exploration of one-message protocols in the QROM, to future work.…”
Section: Sender's Messagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We implicitly use the CH-compiler but in a way, different from [CH20]. We focus on the important set-ting of commit-and-prove NIZK argument systems [Lip16,KOS18,Kiy20], i.e. languages of the form {Com(x 1 ), .…”
Section: Our Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%