2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-009-0843-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Round your numbers in rank tests: exact and asymptotic inference and ties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Kruskal–Wallis test ( H value) was used to test overall age differences, the Mann–Whitney test ( U value) was used to test gender differences or age differences between two groups, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test ( T value) was used to test consistency and duration effects. We followed Neuhaüser and Ruxton's (2009) advice for the use of appropriately rounded mean frequencies prior to the ranking procedure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kruskal–Wallis test ( H value) was used to test overall age differences, the Mann–Whitney test ( U value) was used to test gender differences or age differences between two groups, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test ( T value) was used to test consistency and duration effects. We followed Neuhaüser and Ruxton's (2009) advice for the use of appropriately rounded mean frequencies prior to the ranking procedure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in order to reduce the impact of insignificant differences between 𝐼𝐹 values in the Mann-Whitney 𝑈 test, SPIT rounds all 𝐼𝐹 values to two decimal points. 71 The normal approximation for the 𝑈-statistic 69 is used for tie-correction for group sizes larger than 8. Although SPIT works well with smaller sample sizes (𝑛 ≥ 12) for simple genetic architectures, it requires 𝑛 ≥ 24 samples for each group for the normal approximation to be reliable in SPIT-Test module.…”
Section: Removing Outlier Effects and Tie-correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Neuhauser and Ruxton (2009) noted that rounding of continuous measures creates ties and sometimes can be beneficial. In a similar way, modular ranks created a large number of artificial ‘ties’ in the data sets in the present study, just the reverse of what is typically done before applying rank tests, that is, breaking the ties or averaging the ranks.…”
Section: Some Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%