1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1987.tb01398.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roundtable: What Is Temperament? Four Approaches

Abstract: 4 current approaches to understanding temperament are discussed in the roundtable. In an introductory overview, Goldsmith outlines some of the major convergences and divergences in the understanding of this concept. Theorists representing 4 positions--Goldsmith, Buss and Plomin, Rothbart, and Thomas and Chess--outline their views by responding to each of 6 questions: How do you define temperament and explain the boundaries of the concept? What are the elements of temperatment? How does the construct of tempera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
268
1
8

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(284 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
268
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Although still without a precise and universally accepted definition, 12 the commonly used term 'temperament' generally refers to variations in behavioral predispositions, which are rooted in distinct neurophysiological substrates. 6 The emergence of stable individual differences in neurobehavioral functioning before birth provides the basis for individual differences in reactivity and regulation in infancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although still without a precise and universally accepted definition, 12 the commonly used term 'temperament' generally refers to variations in behavioral predispositions, which are rooted in distinct neurophysiological substrates. 6 The emergence of stable individual differences in neurobehavioral functioning before birth provides the basis for individual differences in reactivity and regulation in infancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of association has stirred both methodological and theoretical debate about the distinction between these supposedly independent domains (Frick, 2004). Complicating matters further is the fact that the definition of temperament remains somewhat elusive (Rothbart, 2004), although there is at least some consensus that temperament refers to individual differences in emotional reactivity and regulation that can be observed early, are moderately stable, and under at least some genetic influence (Goldsmith et al, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous approaches to conceptualizing temperament. However, temperament is generally defined as the physiological basis for the motivational, affective, and regulation components of personality (Goldsmith et al, 1987). Temperament is characterized as physiologically based, relatively consistent over time, and modifiable by the environment and socialization experiences (Rothbart & Bates, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%