2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Route choice stickiness of public transport passengers: Measuring habitual bus ridership behaviour using smart card data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…quartiles according to the conventions of disease mapping (70)(71)(72). Again the quantile regression was iterated for each week using formula 2 (69):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…quartiles according to the conventions of disease mapping (70)(71)(72). Again the quantile regression was iterated for each week using formula 2 (69):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 50th, 75th, and 90th quartiles according to the conventions of disease mapping(66)(67)(68). Again the quantile regression was iterated for each week using formula 2The output tables for these regression models in Additional Files 1-6.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the provision of traffic information or route guidance along the trip, dynamic rerouting behaviour is prevalent under stochastic travel conditions (Zhao, et al, 2017;Xu, et al, 2017). As indicated in the empirical study by Kim et al (2017), passengers would present lower stickiness on the same route with the increase in the number of alternative routes. The performance of transit operation is highly related to the temporal and spatial passenger flow distribution and running fleet (Liu and Singha, 2007;Sorrantina et al, 2006;Wu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%