Routes to diagnosis for cancer – determining the patient journey using multiple routine data sets

Abstract

Background:Cancer survival in England is lower than the European average, which has been at least partly attributed to later stage at diagnosis in English patients. There are substantial regional and demographic variations in cancer survival across England. The majority of patients are diagnosed following symptomatic or incidental presentation. This study defines a methodology by which the route the patient follows to the point of diagnosis can be categorised to examine demographic, organisational, service and personal reasons for delayed diagnosis.Methods:Administrative Hospital Episode Statistics data are linked with Cancer Waiting Times data, data from the cancer screening programmes and cancer registration data. Using these data sets, every case of cancer registered in England, which was diagnosed in 2006–2008, is categorised into one of eight ‘Routes to Diagnosis'.Results:Different cancer types show substantial differences between the proportion of cases that present by each route, in reasonable agreement with previous clinical studies. Patients presenting via Emergency routes have substantially lower 1-year relative survival.Conclusion:Linked cancer registration and administrative data can be used to robustly categorise the route to a cancer diagnosis for all patients. These categories can be used to enhance understanding of and explore possible reasons for delayed diagnosis.

Quantifying the risk of multiple myeloma from symptoms reported in primary care patients: a large case–control study using electronic records

“…4,5 Around 37% of patients with myeloma in the UK are diagnosed as emergency presentations, with a poorer prognosis (51% 12-month survival compared with 81% non-emergencies). 6,7 This is one of the highest proportions among adult cancers.…”

The association between symptoms and bladder or renal tract cancer in primary care: a systematic review

“…The main alternative route to diagnosis is by emergency presentation, with approximately one-quarter of renal or bladder cancers presenting this way. 2,3 Selection of patients for urological referral depends on the patient's symptoms, plus any abnormal examination findings.…”

Diagnostic value of symptoms of oesophagogastric cancers in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…Diagnostic delays are common, with 29% and 36% of patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer respectively having three or more primary care consultations before diagnosis; [1][2][3] furthermore, 22% and 33% of patients are diagnosed with oesophageal and gastric cancer respectively following emergency presentation. 4 An estimated 600 deaths in the UK from oesophagogastric cancer annually are deemed 'avoidable' by comparison with mean European figures. 5 Expedited diagnosis may be beneficial either by identifying the tumour at a less-advanced stage, or by avoiding the emergency presentation, with its extra mortality.…”