2011
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routine 3D magnetic resonance imaging of joints

Abstract: Due to its high spatial resolution and excellent tissue contrast, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has become the most commonly used imaging method to evaluate joints. Most musculoskeletal MR imaging is performed using two-dimensional fast spin-echo sequences. However, three-dimensional sequences have also been used for joint imaging and have the advantage of acquiring thin continuous slices through joints which reduces the effects of partial volume averaging. With recent advances in MR technology, three-dimens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
103
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
0
103
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given the technical and anatomic challenges of hip MRI, the delineation of cartilage from synovial fluid in the hip is inferior with 3D gradient-echo sequences compared with intermediate-weighted 2D sequences. Also, to achieve an SNR with sufficient cartilage signal intensity, long scanning times are necessary [35] and artifacts are more prominent in the 3D sequences mentioned [36]. Therefore, in clinical routine, 3D gradient-echo sequences are limited in assessing cartilage structure and surface abnormalities as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given the technical and anatomic challenges of hip MRI, the delineation of cartilage from synovial fluid in the hip is inferior with 3D gradient-echo sequences compared with intermediate-weighted 2D sequences. Also, to achieve an SNR with sufficient cartilage signal intensity, long scanning times are necessary [35] and artifacts are more prominent in the 3D sequences mentioned [36]. Therefore, in clinical routine, 3D gradient-echo sequences are limited in assessing cartilage structure and surface abnormalities as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional MRI-protocols consists of two-dimensional (2D) turbo spin-echo (TSE) and gradient-echo sequences, repeated in multiple planes. Although these sequences have excellent tissue contrast and high in-plane spatial resolution, their validity is adversely affected by relatively thick slices and intersection small gaps [7]. Moreover, several measurement steps have to be performed to display the joint in multiple planes because voxels are not isotropic and thus multi-planar reformations cannot be performed without loss of image quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with other MRI sequences, which are commonly used in the assessment of hip cartilage and acetabular labrum [11][12][13], the double-echo steady-state (DESS) MR sequence with water excitation offers high-resolution, three-dimensional (3D) imaging and multiplanar reformatting. In addition, its strong fluid signal creates an arthrogram-like effect within the joint [14] that may increase the diagnostic capabilities by increasing the conspicuity of labrum and hip joint cartilage alterations [3] particularly if conventional noncontrast MRI is performed. The radial imaging approach will further improve the visualization of the labrum and the cartilage, as it minimizes volume averaging and image distortion by displaying these structures in perpendicular sections ( Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%