The perception of time is distorted by many factors (e.g., arousal, temperature, age etc.), but is it possible that causality would affect our perception of time? We investigate timing changes in the temporal binding effect, which refers to a subjective shortening of the interval between actions and their outcomes. Four experiments investigated whether binding may be due to variations in the rate of an internal clock. Specifically, we asked whether binding reflects changes to a general timing system, or a dedicated clock unique to causal sequences. We developed a novel experimental paradigm (embedded interval estimation procedure) in which participants made temporal judgments of either causal or noncausal intervals, or the duration of an event embedded within that interval. Stimuli and modality were combined factorially, with interval markers and embedded events being either visual or auditory. Although we replicated the temporal binding effect, we found no evidence for commensurate changes to time perception of the embedded event, which suggests that temporal binding is effected by changes to a specific and dedicated, rather than a general clock system.
Public Significance StatementTime perception is an intuitive and ubiquitous concept. Adages such as "the watched pot never boils" and "time flies when you're having fun" are ubiquitous in everyday parlance. Both sayings refer to the perceived rate of time: in the former, time appears to move slowly, whereas the opposite is true in the latter. Research finds that perceived time is affected by emotions, arousal, temperature, and modality of the content of experience (e.g., auditory or visual). An additional concept however, that also affects temporal judgments is causality; causes and effects are perceived as subjectively closer in time than 2 unrelated events, and duration timing tasks find that cause-effect intervals are judged as shorter than intervals separating unconnected events. Here we show that this causal binding effect is specific to the interval separating the cause from its effect: Causality slows down time perception only for the cause-effect interval; temporal perception for unrelated concurrent events remains unaffected. This finding is problematic for the folk notion of a single "internal clock," but can be explained by theories postulating multiple clocks operating in parallel.