2018
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routine antenatal ultrasound in low‐ and middle‐income countries: first look – a cluster randomised trial

Abstract: Antenatal care ultrasound did not improve a composite outcome that included maternal, fetal, and neonatal mortality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
89
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present the only way to determine the fetal growth rate at primary care level in SA is by measuring the SF height. A recent study of two-stage routine ultrasound scanning in LMICs found no effect on stillbirths or neonatal mortality or an increase in antenatal attendance, [20] seriously calling into question the role of routine ultrasound in preventing perinatal deaths. Screening using continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound may be much more useful than conventional ultrasound and SF measurements in detecting fetuses at risk of stillbirth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present the only way to determine the fetal growth rate at primary care level in SA is by measuring the SF height. A recent study of two-stage routine ultrasound scanning in LMICs found no effect on stillbirths or neonatal mortality or an increase in antenatal attendance, [20] seriously calling into question the role of routine ultrasound in preventing perinatal deaths. Screening using continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound may be much more useful than conventional ultrasound and SF measurements in detecting fetuses at risk of stillbirth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were all collected prospectively. Every case in which oligohydramnios was diagnosed was also confirmed by a radiologist with extensive expertise in ultrasonography in pregnancy [18][19][20][21]. Outcome data were collected independently from the ultrasound study team as part of an ongoing pregnancy outcome registry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this need, we conducted a secondary analysis of data from the First Look Trial, which aimed to determine if the introduction of ultrasound examinations during antenatal care in low-resource settings improved maternal mortality, maternal near-miss mortality, stillbirth and neonatal mortality. The methods and results of the parent trial have been published [17,18]. Our objectives in conducting this planned secondary analysis included determining the prevalence of oligohydramnios, risk factors for this condition, and the maternal and fetal outcomes associated with oligohydramnios in LMIC settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the use of conventional ultrasound diagnostics is a routine component of antenatal care in high-income countries, in many low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), the only way to determine fetal growth rate at the primary care level is by palpation and measuring the symphysis fundal height (SFH) using tape measure [6]. Small studies in LMICs have shown that the use of the conventional ultrasound directly in uences antenatal care (ANC) utilization, improving referral for detected conditions and gestational age dating, and increasing the use of hospital for deliveries [7]. However, Goldenberg et al [7] in their cluster randomized trial, concluded that routine conventional ultrasound found no effect on ANC attendance, reduction in maternal, stillbirth or neonatal mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small studies in LMICs have shown that the use of the conventional ultrasound directly in uences antenatal care (ANC) utilization, improving referral for detected conditions and gestational age dating, and increasing the use of hospital for deliveries [7]. However, Goldenberg et al [7] in their cluster randomized trial, concluded that routine conventional ultrasound found no effect on ANC attendance, reduction in maternal, stillbirth or neonatal mortality. Furthermore, it seems to contribute to the improvement of patient management and the con rmation of clinically suspected obstetric complications [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%