2019
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1651274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routine cervical dilatation at caesarean section and its influence on postoperative pain and complications in obese women: a double blind randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 145 studies were included, of which 126 were randomised controlled trials and 19 were systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (Fig. 1) [9–153]. The methodological quality assessments of the 126 randomised controlled trials included in the final qualitative analysis are summarised in online Supporting Information Table S1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 145 studies were included, of which 126 were randomised controlled trials and 19 were systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (Fig. 1) [9–153]. The methodological quality assessments of the 126 randomised controlled trials included in the final qualitative analysis are summarised in online Supporting Information Table S1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all three, a clinically-relevant reduction in pain scores and rescue analgesia was noted [132][133][134]. Two studies evaluated the application of manual cervical dilation at the end of caesarean section and compared it with no cervical dilation and came to conflicting conclusions [135,136]. One study noted improved pain scores until 7 days postoperatively [135] while the other did not report any pain reduction [36].…”
Section: Postoperative Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%