2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60117-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routine Clinical Examination Is Not Sufficient for Diagnosing and Locating Deeply Infiltrating Endometriosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
77
1
14

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
77
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…During this process, existence of a nodule must be sought during the vaginal touch. Even though, most clinicians sought for nodular lesion (a most standard form observed), it is not a must-to-follow rule [11,12]. It is also true that the outcome of clinical examination varies per the physical location of the lesion.…”
Section: Surgical Versus Conservative Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During this process, existence of a nodule must be sought during the vaginal touch. Even though, most clinicians sought for nodular lesion (a most standard form observed), it is not a must-to-follow rule [11,12]. It is also true that the outcome of clinical examination varies per the physical location of the lesion.…”
Section: Surgical Versus Conservative Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a close examination with the speculum that finds lesions evocative of endometriosis, the upper third of the posterior surface of the vagina is infiltrated. Nevertheless, this proportion is significantly far lower in cases where the bowel or uterosacral ligaments are involved [11]. On the same note, lesions affecting vagina results in more frequent palpation of a nodule or painful infiltration during the vaginal touch [11].…”
Section: Surgical Versus Conservative Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clinical examination alone does not seem to be a good method for detecting peritoneal endometriosis [157]. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound and MRI with regard to various forms of peritoneal endometriosis are shown in Table 9 [158][159][160][161][162][163][164][165][166][167].…”
Section: Endometriosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent trend is to prefer nodule excision, when feasible, than radical digestive resection [8,9] , therefore it is of utmost importance to appreciate endometriotic rectal and sigmoid infiltration, in the pre-operative staging. Diagnosis of recto-sigmoid endometriosis definitely relies on imaging as clinical examination is not sufficient for the diagnosis of location of deeply infiltrating endometriosis [10] . Since the early 1980's different techniques, from barium enema to the most recent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have been proposed and evaluated to achieve diagnosis of endometriosis [3,[11][12][13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%