2004
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1084-0702(2004)9:4(403)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routine Highway Bridge Inspection Condition Documentation Accuracy and Reliability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
89
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average age of these structurally deficient bridges is over 65 years, which well exceeds the average service life of 50 years for those structures (Davis et al, 2013). In an effort to monitor the state of bridges, the federal highway administration currently mandates periodic inspection of all bridges which typically done through visual inspection (National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS), 1996; Phares et al, 2004). However, this has been found to be inefficient and unreliable as it is prone to human errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average age of these structurally deficient bridges is over 65 years, which well exceeds the average service life of 50 years for those structures (Davis et al, 2013). In an effort to monitor the state of bridges, the federal highway administration currently mandates periodic inspection of all bridges which typically done through visual inspection (National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS), 1996; Phares et al, 2004). However, this has been found to be inefficient and unreliable as it is prone to human errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this has been found to be inefficient and unreliable as it is prone to human errors. Phares et al looked at the accuracy and reliability of these routine bridge inspections and found that 56% of average condition ratings are incorrect with a probability of 95% (Phares et al, 2004). Because civil infrastructure, such as bridges, roads, dams, and buildings plays a crucial role in the socio-economic life and development of a country, there is a need for reliable methods to assess the condition of structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is of great significance to identify the optimal placement of precast bridge deck slabs with respect to precast girders to minimize the mismatches between shear pockets and shear connectors. However, precast components are currently manually inspected by certified inspectors using traditional tools such as measuring tapes, which is time-consuming, expensive, and subjective [3]. Hence, it is necessary to develop techniques that can automatically and accurately assess the dimensional quality of precast components such as precast bridge deck slabs and precast girders for estimating the optimal placement of precast bridge deck slabs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, important details can be missed, misinterpreted, or field measurements and calculations can be incorrect during the inspection. Second, visual inspections and reports may not be as thorough as required (Kempton et al, 2001;Menches et al, 2008;Phares et al, 2001). Finally, interpretation of the reports and overall results of the inspection can vary (Kempton et al, 2001;Menches et al, 2008;Phares et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%