2017
DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routine Replacement of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several randomized controlled trials, a Cochrane review, and clinical practice guidelines recommend prompt removal of PIVCs when not required, if there are any complications, or if the PIVC was inserted urgently without an aseptic insertion technique. 21,28,35,36 Idle PIVCs have been implicated in adverse patient outcomes, including phlebitis and CABSI. 13,27 The substantial proportion of patients with a PIVC in this study who had no clinical indication for a PIVC, a symptomatic insertion site, malfunctioning catheter, and suboptimal dressing quality suggests the need for physicians, advanced practitioners, and nurses to adopt evidence-based PIVC insertion and maintenance bundles and supporting checklists to reduce the prevalence of PIVC complications.…”
Section: Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several randomized controlled trials, a Cochrane review, and clinical practice guidelines recommend prompt removal of PIVCs when not required, if there are any complications, or if the PIVC was inserted urgently without an aseptic insertion technique. 21,28,35,36 Idle PIVCs have been implicated in adverse patient outcomes, including phlebitis and CABSI. 13,27 The substantial proportion of patients with a PIVC in this study who had no clinical indication for a PIVC, a symptomatic insertion site, malfunctioning catheter, and suboptimal dressing quality suggests the need for physicians, advanced practitioners, and nurses to adopt evidence-based PIVC insertion and maintenance bundles and supporting checklists to reduce the prevalence of PIVC complications.…”
Section: Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the issue of PIVC remains unresolved and a public health challenge [ 18 ], and the incidence of complications is still higher. There is certainly a pressing need for credible research and forwarding suggestions on this area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a PIV can be left in place for several days, IO devices are not recommended to be left in place for more than 24 hours. 8 , 20 21 Additionally, IO is significantly more expensive than PIV, approximately $80–$120 per use vs $1–$2 per use for PIV. 22 – 23 This is in contrast to US military personnel who may use IO or PIV as first-line vascular access in combat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%