Abstract:Objective: To evaluate an immunochromatographic (IC) strip assay for Hb Bart's as a routine screening test for a-thalassaemia in area with a high prevalence of thalassaemia and haemoglobinopathies. Methods: A total of 300 adult screen positive blood specimens were collected at an ongoing thalassaemia screening programme in northeast Thailand. Routine screening was done using red blood cell indices, osmotic fragility, and dichlorophenolindophenol tests. The IC strip assay for haemoglobin Bart's was performed on… Show more
“…It removes the time-consuming microscopy examination in the HbH-i and gives an improved turnaround time. Both our study and the published studies 8,9,16 showed the ICT is more sensitive and more specific than the HbH-i.…”
The ICT is simple to perform, with higher sensitivity than HbH-i, and gives the result in a short time and at a lower cost. This can be used by clinical laboratories to replace HbH-i for α-thalassaemia detection.
“…It removes the time-consuming microscopy examination in the HbH-i and gives an improved turnaround time. Both our study and the published studies 8,9,16 showed the ICT is more sensitive and more specific than the HbH-i.…”
The ICT is simple to perform, with higher sensitivity than HbH-i, and gives the result in a short time and at a lower cost. This can be used by clinical laboratories to replace HbH-i for α-thalassaemia detection.
“…This might indicate cross-reactivity of the anti-ζ-globin chain with other globin chains. A similar finding with 50 out of 63 (79.4%) false positives from α + -thalassaemia has been observed for the IC strip assay for Hb Bart's 10. Further details on the titre of the monoclonal antibodies used in the kit and cross-reactivity with other globin chains are not available.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Although this indicates a sensitivity of 100% for the IC strip assay in screening for (– SEA ) α 0 -thalassaemia, a relatively low specificity was noted (85%). We have previously shown that an IC strip assay for Hb Bart's could yield a similar diagnostic performance with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 73.1% 10. This is in contrast to the spectrophotometric or fluorescence microscope-based ζ-globin chain detection by ELISA reported previously with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity ranging between 94% and 98% 16 22 23.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The (– FIL ) α 0 - thalassaemia deletion has not been found in the region and the prevalence of (– THAI ) α 0 -thalassaemia is very low 25. It is conceivable that using this proposed protocol in combination with other additional tests—for example, the Hb H inclusion test 8 or IC strip assay for Hb Bart's9 10—would help in preventing a misdiagnosis of cases with these rare α 0 -thalassaemia defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could lead to an unnecessary workload and expenses of post-screening Hb and DNA analyses. In order to minimise this, several approaches have been introduced into the screening protocol—for example, the use of a modified Hb H inclusion test in combination with OF and DCIP tests7 8 and identification of Hb Bart's 9 10. While the Hb H inclusion test is laborious and the result is highly observer-dependent, identification of Hb Bart's is affected by other forms of thalassaemia, especially α + -thalassaemia which is commonly encountered in the region.…”
IC strip assay for ζ-globin is simple, rapid and does not require sophisticated equipment. Use of this test in addition to the existing screening protocol could detect potential (--) α-thalassaemia leading to a significant reduction in the workload of DNA analysis. This could be used in areas where haemoglobinopathies are prevalent and heterogeneous but molecular testing is not available.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.