2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routine surveillance imaging following mild traumatic brain injury with intracranial hemorrhage may not be necessary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The secondary outcome in this study focused on the need for routine repeat neuroimaging following mTBI complicated by ICI, a source of ongoing debate and investigation. Although several studies have suggested that repeat neuroimaging may be low yield, 3,12,39 other studies have reported high rates of radiologic progression. 16 Given that nearly half of respondents supported ordering repeat neuroimaging but only 12% thought it was likely to change clinical management, higher level multicenter evidence is needed to guide this important decision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The secondary outcome in this study focused on the need for routine repeat neuroimaging following mTBI complicated by ICI, a source of ongoing debate and investigation. Although several studies have suggested that repeat neuroimaging may be low yield, 3,12,39 other studies have reported high rates of radiologic progression. 16 Given that nearly half of respondents supported ordering repeat neuroimaging but only 12% thought it was likely to change clinical management, higher level multicenter evidence is needed to guide this important decision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, there remains ongoing debate and uncertainty regarding the role of and indications for repeat neuroimaging in the management of these patients. 16,21,23,39…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Much of the morbidity from traumatic brain injury occurs in children with intracranial hemorrhage, and clinicians closely monitor patients for hemorrhage progression with neuro-imaging techniques. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Computed tomography (CT) scans are the standard acute neuroimaging modality to both identify intracranial hemorrhage and monitor for hemorrhage progression because of its diagnostic accuracy, availability, and rapidity of results. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Children with intracranial hemorrhage undergo an average of 1-3 repeat CT scans during acute hospitalization, with 40%-88% of children undergoing at least 1 repeat CT scan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Computed tomography (CT) scans are the standard acute neuroimaging modality to both identify intracranial hemorrhage and monitor for hemorrhage progression because of its diagnostic accuracy, availability, and rapidity of results. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Children with intracranial hemorrhage undergo an average of 1-3 repeat CT scans during acute hospitalization, with 40%-88% of children undergoing at least 1 repeat CT scan. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] However, CT scans have inherent risks, particularly if they are used repeatedly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation