2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2004.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routing demands with time-varying bandwidth profiles on a MPLS network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…¶ With these assumptions, the problem studied in this paper is very similar to the bandwidth-constrained routing in wired networks, where a demand is accepted if and only if the network can provide the required bandwidth. The problem was studied in the context of LSP routing in MPLS networks, wherein the number of accepted demands (or equivalently, demand acceptance rate) is a widely used measure of the network performance [16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…¶ With these assumptions, the problem studied in this paper is very similar to the bandwidth-constrained routing in wired networks, where a demand is accepted if and only if the network can provide the required bandwidth. The problem was studied in the context of LSP routing in MPLS networks, wherein the number of accepted demands (or equivalently, demand acceptance rate) is a widely used measure of the network performance [16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the required bandwidth cannot be guaranteed, the demand is rejected. A higher number of accepted demands implies better resource utilization and higher performance; hence, in the QoS provisioning context, the network performance is usually measured in terms of the acceptance rate of the traffic demands [16][17][18][19][20]. Consequently, to perform the desired comparisons between channel allocation schemes in the context, we need to measure acceptance rates obtained by dynamic and static channel allocation schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%