2017
DOI: 10.1109/tc.2017.2709742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routing or Computing? The Paradigm Shift Towards Intelligent Computer Network Packet Transmission Based on Deep Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
122
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
122
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that each boxplot represents the results over 100 scenarios with different input traffic matrices of the same traffic intensity (TI). To this end, we randomly generated 100 traffic matrices (T M) for each TI (from 11 to 16) according to Equation (7). For each optimization strategy, we provide the resulting performance metrics computed by our packet-level simulator after applying the routing configuration selected in each case.…”
Section: A Delay Jitter and Loss-aware Routing Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that each boxplot represents the results over 100 scenarios with different input traffic matrices of the same traffic intensity (TI). To this end, we randomly generated 100 traffic matrices (T M) for each TI (from 11 to 16) according to Equation (7). For each optimization strategy, we provide the resulting performance metrics computed by our packet-level simulator after applying the routing configuration selected in each case.…”
Section: A Delay Jitter and Loss-aware Routing Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13: Save the knowledges (s(t), s(t + 1), r(t), r(t + 1)) in M . 14 Afterwards, noting that A as the action space, the discounted cumulative state function is formulated as…”
Section: B Learning Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 In the traffic flow prediction, the common parameter models mainly include the moving average (MA) model, autoregressive (AR) model, autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model, maximum likelihood estimate model, Kalman filtering (KF) model, etc. 17,18 In the traffic flow prediction, the common parameter models mainly include the moving average (MA) model, autoregressive (AR) model, autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model, maximum likelihood estimate model, Kalman filtering (KF) model, etc.…”
Section: Parameter Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameter models are the methods of establishing a structured expression and variables assumptions to calculate the experimental data, and the models are usually composed of the fixed assumptions and parameters. 17,18 In the traffic flow prediction, the common parameter models mainly include the moving average (MA) model, autoregressive (AR) model, autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model, maximum likelihood estimate model, Kalman filtering (KF) model, etc. The most commonly used of these parametric models is the KF model, which is a control method-based linear regression.…”
Section: Parameter Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%