2014
DOI: 10.4324/9780203093801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Military Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scholar employed qualitative research methodologies due to the nature of the issue. It comprises method, which is often used as a synonym for any data gathering technique (such as a survey) or data analysis process that creates or utilizes actual information, including graphs or statistical analysis (Soeters, Shields & Rietjens, 2014). The researcher conducted both descriptive and correlational studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scholar employed qualitative research methodologies due to the nature of the issue. It comprises method, which is often used as a synonym for any data gathering technique (such as a survey) or data analysis process that creates or utilizes actual information, including graphs or statistical analysis (Soeters, Shields & Rietjens, 2014). The researcher conducted both descriptive and correlational studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is difficult to identify causal mechanisms, and we should always be careful to interpret survey data because of sample and other biases, the results clearly show that officers' views of technology have a significant impact on their views about military transformation. This work relies on a bottom-up approach that focuses on individual-level analysis through surveys, a method that is increasingly diffused in military studies (Soeters et al 2014). Although the present research maximized internal validity at the expenses of external one, it also provides an original "pilot study" that can be then adapted and replicated for other services and other countries, thus expanding knowledge of military officers' perceptions and, their drivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the author says, it is important to distinguish defence from the art of war, which is narrower (it focuses on armed struggle in the military sense), and from security studies, which are broader than defence studies. The publication fills a niche that has not been filled by textbooks such as Qualitative Methods in Military Studies (Carreiras and Castro, 2011), The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Military Studies (Soeters, Shields and Rietjens, 2014), and the broader Oxford Handbook of International Security (Gheciu and Wohlforth, 2018). The purpose of the book is to provide the reader with overviews of the methods used in various social sciences to study the area of defence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%