2015
DOI: 10.4324/9780203762844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Routledge International Handbook of Memory Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has transformed into an object of scholarly study, as indicated by the recent increase in books that attempt to trace the genealogy of the field and anthologies that seek to define a critical canon of memory studies. Collections like Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook (Erll & Nünning, ), The Collective Memory Reader (Olick, Vinitzky‐Seroussi, & Levy, ), and the recent Routledge International Handbook of Memory Studies (Tota & Hagan, ) have been complemented by monographs which also focus on memory as a methodology such as Astrid Erll's Memory in Culture (), Patrick Hutton's The Memory Phenomenon in Contemporary Historical Writing: How the Interest in Memory Has Influenced Our Understanding of History (), Marek Tamm's Afterlife of Events: Perspectives on Mnemohistory (), and Martin Pogačar's Media Archaeologies, Micro‐Archives and Storytelling: Re‐presencing the Past (), just to name a few examples. The fact that academic presses such as Palgrave Macmillan and Routledge have series devoted to varieties of memory studies has served to further legitimize and promote the field, as has the appearance of journals such as History & Memory and Memory Studies and the formation of an international Memory Studies Association .…”
Section: The History Of Memory Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has transformed into an object of scholarly study, as indicated by the recent increase in books that attempt to trace the genealogy of the field and anthologies that seek to define a critical canon of memory studies. Collections like Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook (Erll & Nünning, ), The Collective Memory Reader (Olick, Vinitzky‐Seroussi, & Levy, ), and the recent Routledge International Handbook of Memory Studies (Tota & Hagan, ) have been complemented by monographs which also focus on memory as a methodology such as Astrid Erll's Memory in Culture (), Patrick Hutton's The Memory Phenomenon in Contemporary Historical Writing: How the Interest in Memory Has Influenced Our Understanding of History (), Marek Tamm's Afterlife of Events: Perspectives on Mnemohistory (), and Martin Pogačar's Media Archaeologies, Micro‐Archives and Storytelling: Re‐presencing the Past (), just to name a few examples. The fact that academic presses such as Palgrave Macmillan and Routledge have series devoted to varieties of memory studies has served to further legitimize and promote the field, as has the appearance of journals such as History & Memory and Memory Studies and the formation of an international Memory Studies Association .…”
Section: The History Of Memory Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, this research is based on the principle of feminist CRT practice in oral history, which draws from the interviewees' memory and reflections as a tool for feminist and POC intersectional scholarship (Gluck & Patai, 1991;Johnson, 2000;Matsuda, 1991). Collective memory studies are an essential method for urban sociology to construct a history of space and illuminate social inequalities (Hunter et al, 2018;Tota & Hagen, 2015). While research on female leadership exists, primarily in an urban context, there is limited research on the impact of racial-ethnic identity and activism (Hicks, 2010;Yoder et al, 1998;Yosso, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rubin (2002, p. 81) [16], for example, in illustrating the aim of cultural history, states that access to the past is mediated through "the informed subjectivity, human and intellectual capacities for categorization, system-building and empathy" and the "wishes, pain, hope and desire" that the historian brings to the past. Moreover, if we switch from the historical realm to that of memory studies, statements about the constructive nature of any process of remembrance and/or narration of the past become even more radical (Tota and Hagen, 2016) [17]. If one considers the current debate on memory studies (Olick, Vinitzky-Seroussi and Levy, 2011) [18], concerns about the authenticity of the past can be framed in terms of the past's structure of plausibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%