1996
DOI: 10.1063/1.472905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rovibrationally averaged nuclear magnetic shielding tensors calculated at the coupled-cluster level

Abstract: A comparison of models for calculating nuclear magnetic resonance shielding tensors Multirank nuclear magnetic resonance studies of halfinteger quadrupolar nuclei in solids by threedimensional dynamicangle correlation spectroscopy Molecular quadrupole moment functions of HF and N2. I. Ab initio linearresponse coupledcluster results Nuclear magnetic shielding tensor functions for H 2 , HF, N 2 , CO, and F 2 are calculated at the coupled-cluster singles and doubles level augmented by a perturbative correction fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
151
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
9
151
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, as also noted by Patchkovskii et al, 19 this value of Ϸ0.3 ppm corresponds to a typical vibrational correction to the 1 H NMR chemical shifts. 34,35 In special cases the vibrational correction may even become twice as large. 36 Therefore, evaluating the performance of the SAOP potential for 1 H would require further work on the vibrational corrections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, as also noted by Patchkovskii et al, 19 this value of Ϸ0.3 ppm corresponds to a typical vibrational correction to the 1 H NMR chemical shifts. 34,35 In special cases the vibrational correction may even become twice as large. 36 Therefore, evaluating the performance of the SAOP potential for 1 H would require further work on the vibrational corrections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the results of the current work, in the cc-pVQZ basis set the CCSDT-GIAO estimate for iso ( 13 C) in ethyne is 0.31 ppm lower than its CCSD(T)-GIAO counterpart. While this is a change in the right direction, at this stage it is not possible to predict whether the use of CCSDT-GIAO rather than CCSD(T)-GIAO throughout, within a very large basis set, plus a thermal correction, [30] would be sufficient to eliminate the remaining difference between the experimental and theoretical values.…”
Section: Giao Ccsd(t)-giao Casscf-giao Mp2-giao and Hf-giao Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 The most important are (i) the contribution of rovibrational corrections and averaging, which have been determined for only a few systems, 10,14 and (ii) the contribution of intermolecular interactions, or, more generally speaking, solvent effects. The influence of these two factors is fairly constant for similar molecular systems under similar external conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%