2016
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/49/8/084001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rovibrationally resolved photodissociation of SH+

Abstract: Abstract. Photodissociation cross sections for the SH + radical are computed from all rovibrational (RV) levels of the ground electronic state X 3 Σ − for wavelengths from threshold to 500Å. The five electronic transitions,treated with a fully quantum-mechanical two-state model, i.e. no non-adiabatic coupling between excited states was included in our work.. The photodissociation calculations incorporate adiabatic potentials and transition dipole moment functions computed in the multireference configuration in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a similar manner to our recent all electron molecular structure and resulting dynamical studies on diatomic systems such as: SiO (Forrey et al 2016;Cairnie et al 2017), CS (Pattillo et al 2018;Forrey et al 2018), HeC + (Babb & McLaughlin 2017a), SH + (Shen et al 2015;McMillan et al 2016), CH + (Babb & McLaughlin 2017b), and HeAr + (Babb & McLaughlin 2018), the potential energy curves (PECs) and transition dipole moments (TDMs) for the eighteen singlet, triplet and quintet electronic states are calculated within an MRCI+Q approximation for the approach of ground state carbon atoms. That is, we use a state-averaged-multi-configuration-self-consistent-field (SA-MCSCF) approach, followed by multi-reference configuration interaction (MRCI) calculations together with the Davidson correction (MRCI+Q) (Helgaker et al 2000).…”
Section: Potential Curves and Transition Dipole Momentssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In a similar manner to our recent all electron molecular structure and resulting dynamical studies on diatomic systems such as: SiO (Forrey et al 2016;Cairnie et al 2017), CS (Pattillo et al 2018;Forrey et al 2018), HeC + (Babb & McLaughlin 2017a), SH + (Shen et al 2015;McMillan et al 2016), CH + (Babb & McLaughlin 2017b), and HeAr + (Babb & McLaughlin 2018), the potential energy curves (PECs) and transition dipole moments (TDMs) for the eighteen singlet, triplet and quintet electronic states are calculated within an MRCI+Q approximation for the approach of ground state carbon atoms. That is, we use a state-averaged-multi-configuration-self-consistent-field (SA-MCSCF) approach, followed by multi-reference configuration interaction (MRCI) calculations together with the Davidson correction (MRCI+Q) (Helgaker et al 2000).…”
Section: Potential Curves and Transition Dipole Momentssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In Table 1 the equilibrium distance and dissociation energies, D e and D 0 , of SH + obtained in previous works are compared with the present results. All the theoretical values of D 0 (McMillan et al 2016;Stancil et al 2000;Song et al 2018;Zanchet et al 2013a) are within the experimental uncertainty (Huber & Herzberg 1979;Dunlavey et al 1979;Rostas et al 1984). Assuming that the accuracy of theoretical calculations improves with the size of the basis set, we conclude that the SH + diatomic considered in this work is slightly more accurate than the one used previously (Zanchet et al 2013a).…”
Section: Ab Initio Calculations and Analytical Fitsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…On the other hand, the constants of the H 2 diatomic are similar using the AVQZ or the AV6Z basis set, leading to the same D e . As a consequence, the increase of the SH + dissociation energy yields a reduction in the endothermicity of the reaction by about 5meV in our present PES, but this value may still be overestimated considering that McMillan et al (2016) find a D e that is 12 meV deeper using a aV6Z basis set in a study centered on the SH + diatomic. The second difference is not related to the size of the basis set, but to the sampling of ab initio points on the PES.…”
Section: Ab Initio Calculations and Analytical Fitmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The direct photodissociation cross section of SH + is calculated ab initio by McMillan et al (2016) including transitions to several excited states. Their calculation from the v = 0 and J = 0 ground-state level was adopted here and added to this additional absorption into the longer-wavelength bound-levels of the A 3 Π state, which is known to predissociate for v ≥ 1 (Gustafsson et al 1988;Brites et al 2008).…”
Section: Sh + -Mercapto Ionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their calculation from the v = 0 and J = 0 ground-state level was adopted here and added to this additional absorption into the longer-wavelength bound-levels of the A 3 Π state, which is known to predissociate for v ≥ 1 (Gustafsson et al 1988;Brites et al 2008). Oscillator strength of transitions into the vibrational levels of A 3 Π were calculated here using the potential-energy curves and transition dipole moments of McMillan et al (2016) and the methods of Sect. 4.3.49, but did not include details of their rotational structure.…”
Section: Sh + -Mercapto Ionmentioning
confidence: 99%