RRI measurement and assessment

Poel, I.R. van de

doi:10.4324/9780429298998-25

Cited by 6 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Recent publications with reference to the practical use of RRI indicate an increasing interest in this field of tools-oriented research (see e.g., Yaghmaei et al, 2019 ; Kwee et al, 2021 ). The volume by van de Poel ( 2020 ), for example, provides an overview of recent efforts to further developing indicators for the operationalization of the RRI concept. Today, there exist various indicator sets that vary significantly from one another in terms of their characteristics, goals, addressed RRI dimensions and/or types of assessment.…”

Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Today, there exist various indicator sets that vary significantly from one another in terms of their characteristics, goals, addressed RRI dimensions and/or types of assessment. As also van de Poel's ( 2020 , p. 350) states “one might wonder how what is supposedly one concept can lead to such diverse constructs.”…”

Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There are a number of concept-immanent challenges when operationalizing RRI (see also the discussion by van de Poel, 2020 ). First, we have to acknowledge that RRI is a deeply normative concept.…”

Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This normativity concerns not only the question what a responsible innovation or responsible research might be, but also what RRI is and can or should do (see also Doezema et al, 2019 ; Wittrock et al, 2021 ; Völker et al, 2023 ). As also van de Poel ( 2020 , p. 351) states, RRI “expresses what is desirable, not what is factually the case.” This means that in the attempt to measure RRI, “at least some of the attributes need to be normative or involve normative judgments” (van de Poel, 2020 , p. 351). At the same time, we see that there is no common agreement or understanding of what RRI is or should be.…”

Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The associated (re)arranging, (re)interpreting, and/or applying of existing quality criteria is also explicitly desired in the context of RRI operationalization (Wickson and Carew, 2014 ). In this way, indicators can be derived from the RRI dimensions that cannot be measured directly, which make the respective RRI dimension measurable as a proxy (van de Poel, 2020 ).…”

Section: Indicator System Conceptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Responsibly shaping technology innovation for the energy transition: an RRI indicator system as a tool

Buchmann

Wolf

Müller

et al. 2023

Front. Res. Metr. Anal.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Efforts to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions have had limited success. For many, the hopes rest on new energy innovations to advance the energy transition process. In this paper, we develop a Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) base indicator system to steer the design of innovations in the field of energy transition innovations and, thus, improve social acceptance of these innovations. We propose a guideline for its application to assist R&D performing organizations and funding organizations in the design, selection, and communication of research proposals. The indicator system is intended to promote early integration of environmental and social aspects, support the formation of teams aware of the different responsibility aspects of innovation, and monitor progress in regard to relevant RRI dimensions.

show abstract

Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Indicator System Conceptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Responsibly shaping technology innovation for the energy transition: an RRI indicator system as a tool

Buchmann

Wolf

Müller

et al. 2023

Front. Res. Metr. Anal.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Navigating the perils of artificial intelligence: a focused review on ChatGPT and responsible research and innovation

Polyportis,

Pahos

2024

Humanit Soc Sci Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) tools holds promise for delivering benefits, it is important to acknowledge the associated risks of their deployment. In this article, we conduct a focused literature review to address two central research inquiries concerning ChatGPT and similar AI tools. Firstly, we examine the potential pitfalls linked with the development and implementation of ChatGPT across the individual, organizational, and societal levels. Secondly, we explore the role of a multi-stakeholder responsible research and innovation framework in guiding chatbots’ sustainable development and utilization. Drawing inspiration from responsible research and innovation and stakeholder theory principles, we underscore the necessity of comprehensive ethical guidelines to navigate the design, inception, and utilization of emerging AI innovations. The findings of the focused review shed light on the potential perils of ChatGPT implementation across various societal levels, including issues such as devaluation of relationships, unemployment, privacy concerns, bias, misinformation, and digital inequities. Furthermore, the proposed multi-stakeholder Responsible Research and Innovation framework can empower AI stakeholders to proactively anticipate and deliberate upon AI’s ethical, social, and environmental implications, thus substantially contributing to the pursuit of responsible AI implementation.

show abstract

Participation in monitoring and evaluation for RRI: a review of procedural approaches developing monitoring and evaluation mechanisms

Monsonís-Payá,

Iñigo,

Blok

2023

Journal of Responsible Innovation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RRI measurement and assessment

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Responsibly shaping technology innovation for the energy transition: an RRI indicator system as a tool

Responsibly shaping technology innovation for the energy transition: an RRI indicator system as a tool

Navigating the perils of artificial intelligence: a focused review on ChatGPT and responsible research and innovation

Participation in monitoring and evaluation for RRI: a review of procedural approaches developing monitoring and evaluation mechanisms

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About