2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13529-3_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RSCTC’2010 Discovery Challenge: Mining DNA Microarray Data for Medical Diagnosis and Treatment

Abstract: Abstract. RSCTC'2010 Discovery Challenge was a special event of Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing conference. The challenge was organized in the form of an interactive on-line competition, at TunedIT.org platform, in days between Dec 1, 2009 and Feb 28, 2010. The task was related to feature selection in analysis of DNA microarray data and classification of samples for the purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment. Prizes were awarded to the best solutions. This paper describes organization of the comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of 2-class problems, balanced accuracy is equivalent to Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) criterion [38]. One can meet with the interpretation that balanced accuracy calculated for a number of classes is a generalization of AUC for multi-class problems [44].…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of 2-class problems, balanced accuracy is equivalent to Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) criterion [38]. One can meet with the interpretation that balanced accuracy calculated for a number of classes is a generalization of AUC for multi-class problems [44].…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utilized feature selection methods were based on correlation test [135], t-test [88,136] and the relief algorithm [138], respectively. Table 14 shows the results of this comparison for six data tables from the basic track of RSCTC'2010 Discovery Challenge [37]. The results are also visualized in Figure 17.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Dynamic Rule-based Similarity Model On Micmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There are also several other research directions of the author that had a significant influence on the design of the proposed similarity learning models. Among them, the most important considered the problem of feature selection and learning with ensembles of single and multi-label classifiers [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. Moreover, the research on unsupervised version of Rule-Based Similarity was largely influenced by the author's previous work on the semantic information retrieval and Explicit Semantic Analysis, which was conducted within the SYNAT project [38][39][40].…”
Section: Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This particular criterion had been already used in several others data mining competitions, e.g. [18]. It is insensitive to skewed distribution of decisions and thus promotes classifiers which are able to robustly identify labels of cases from minority classes.…”
Section: B Evaluation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%