2013
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-2449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RSV Immunoprophylaxis: Does the Benefit Justify the Cost?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…8 The authors report the mean among children with 'no high-risk condition,' which incorporated children born prematurely and those with other comorbid conditions ($8099), but they do not report estimates for premature infants or those who have other significant risk factors for RSV. 7 Although an approximation of $8000 has been used as an estimate for the cost of an RSV hospitalization in prophylaxis cost-effectiveness calculations, 9 this figure is not specific to hospitalizations for RSV, and its use for that purpose is therefore inaccurate. The estimated costs used in such calculations should be specific to gestational age and health condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 The authors report the mean among children with 'no high-risk condition,' which incorporated children born prematurely and those with other comorbid conditions ($8099), but they do not report estimates for premature infants or those who have other significant risk factors for RSV. 7 Although an approximation of $8000 has been used as an estimate for the cost of an RSV hospitalization in prophylaxis cost-effectiveness calculations, 9 this figure is not specific to hospitalizations for RSV, and its use for that purpose is therefore inaccurate. The estimated costs used in such calculations should be specific to gestational age and health condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a recent study that summarized trends in bronchiolitis hospitalizations reported an average cost of $8530. 8 Other researchers have assumed that this figure was applicable to all palivizumab-eligible infant populations, 9 when in fact this is the average cost of hospitalizations for infants <2 years of age with bronchiolitis, and is neither specific to RSV nor to high-risk infants. Summary statistics such as this are unlikely to accurately reflect the experience of high-risk infants, who represent a small proportion of the total infant population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(49, 50) However, in the lower risk groups (for whom prophylaxis continues to be given), the number-needed-to-treat (NNT) is in the range of 19-170, conferring an unfavorable cost:benefit ratio given the high cost of the drug. (51) Whether palivizumab prevents future wheezing episodes, as suggested by relatively preliminary data from two industry sponsored trial, (52, 53) remains unproven. Clearly, the causal relationship between RSV or other viruses and the future development of asthma requires ongoing investigation.…”
Section: Therapeuticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 As noted by others, 12 the cost of palivizumab administration was high at both the infant and population level , and the effect of palivizumab was limited. The 29-to 32-week preterm infants had a difference in hospitalization rates of 1.9% between infants who did or did not receive palivizumab.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%