2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1386-6532(01)00211-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RT-PCR based analysis of cell culture negative stools samples from poliomyelitis suspected cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, only 12.8% of all of the AFP cases reported in this study were positively diagnosed for enteroviruses by virus isolation. The low sensitivity of cell culture may be due to a low concentration of infectious viruses in stool or the presence of enterovirus serotypes (especially coxsackievirus group A) that grow poorly or not at all in tissue culture (5,11). Cell-culture sensitivity may be affected by toxicity of the samples and inappropriate transport or storage of live organisms, which does favor less viral infectivity but not necessarily detection by RT-PCR (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, only 12.8% of all of the AFP cases reported in this study were positively diagnosed for enteroviruses by virus isolation. The low sensitivity of cell culture may be due to a low concentration of infectious viruses in stool or the presence of enterovirus serotypes (especially coxsackievirus group A) that grow poorly or not at all in tissue culture (5,11). Cell-culture sensitivity may be affected by toxicity of the samples and inappropriate transport or storage of live organisms, which does favor less viral infectivity but not necessarily detection by RT-PCR (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some enteroviruses do not grow in the conventional cell lines that are being used for enterovirus detection (5). Furthermore, the virus titer is an important factor in the sensitivity of cell culture to detect the virus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveillance for AFP is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) using the standard approach for poliovirus surveillance for the purposes of Global Polio Eradication (Anonymous, 2006). A wide variety of nonpolio enteroviruses and other picornaviruses have been identified in stool specimens of AFP cases (Bingjun et al, 2008;Kapoor et al, 2008;Oberste et al, 2006;Saeed et al, 2007;Santos et al, 2002;Shoja et al, 2007). Detection of high-prevalence agents from a non-sterile site is not sufficient to conclusively establish an aetiological link of picornavirus infection with disease; however, given the known ability of many picornaviruses to cause central nervous system (CNS) disease, it is likely that these viruses contribute to at least a fraction of AFP cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method, known as PCR, has allowed the detection of hard to culture pathogens for traditional microbiological laboratories [13][14][15][16][17]. Even though this technique just exposes the presence of genetic material of the procured microorganism (this not implying evidence of the presence of a viable organism), PCR has been demonstrated to be quite useful when is together with an appropriate clinical approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%