This study is to complement an early report (the manuscript is attached for review purpose) on the role of interlayer on activity and performance stability in praseodymium nickelates. The aforementioned report showed a remarkable 48% increase in power density while switching from common GDC interlayer to a new interlayer chemistry (PGCO). Furthermore, a stable long-term performance was linked with suppressed reaction between the cathode and PGCO interlayer. In this article, we report in situ studies of the phase evolution. The high energy XRD studies at a synchrotron source showed fully suppressed phase transition in praseodymium nickelates with PGCO interlayer, while the electrodes on the GDC interlayer undergo substantial phase transformation. Furthermore, in operando and post-test XRD analyses shown fully suppressed structural changes in electrodes operated in full cells at 750 • C and 0.80 V for 500 hours. SEM-EDS analysis showed that the formation of PrO x at the cathode-interlayer interface may play a role in a decrease of mechanical integrity of the interfaces, due to thermal expansion mismatch, leading to a local stress between the two phases. Consequently, phase evolution at a narrow interface may propagate toward the electrode bulk, leading to structural changes and performance degradation. The interest for Pr 2 NiO 4 (PNO) electrode stems from the necessity to develop active and stable oxygen electrodes 1-6 for solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs).7-9 PNO is known for its highly active nature, 7,8,10 originated from its superior oxygen ion diffusion, surface exchange coeffocient 2,7,9-11 and structural flexibility over a wide temperature region (from 500 to 900• C). 3,12 PNO electrode, however, does undergo the structural evolution to form a higher order phase (Pr 3 Ni 2 O 7 ) and Pr 6 O 11 (PrO x ). 8 The structural change has been a major concern because it possibly links with the performance degradation over a long-term operation.7,8 Conventional X-ray diffraction (XRD) has been extensively used to investigate the structural evolution in nickelates in the form of powders or planar electrodes. 8,10 This method has two major limitations due to its low flux and low resolution: (1) it might overlook the presence of additional phases in the system, which is especially true for praseodymium nickelates where XRD diffraction patterns of higher order phase(s) (e.x. Pr 3 Ni 2 O 7 ) may overlap with the parent PNO phase, making quantification challenging; 8 and (2) the quantification of phase evolution in electrochemically operated PNO electrode may show major structural change with almost 100% of the parent phase transition from the conventional XRD analysis, while the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies clearly show the regions of preserved PNO phase.
7On the other hand, the high energy and high flux XRD (obtained at a synchrotron source) allows us to detect and resolve the presence of secondary phase(s), and in combination with high resolution capability provides the most accurate measurement regardin...