Rudimentary empathy in macaques’ social decision-making

Abstract

Primates live in highly social environments, where prosocial behaviors promote social bonds and cohesion and contribute to group members' fitness. Despite a growing interest in the biological basis of nonhuman primates' social interactions, their underlying motivations remain a matter of debate. We report that macaque monkeys take into account the welfare of their peers when making behavioral choices bringing about pleasant or unpleasant outcomes to a monkey partner. Two macaques took turns in making decisions that could impact their own welfare or their partner's. Most monkeys were inclined to refrain from delivering a mildly aversive airpuff and to grant juice rewards to their partner. Choice consistency between these two types of outcome suggests that monkeys display coherent motivations in different social interactions. Furthermore, spontaneous affilitative group interactions in the home environment were mostly consistent with the measured social decisions, thus emphasizing the impact of preexisting social bonds on decision-making. Interestingly, unique behavioral markers predicted these decisions: benevolence was associated with enhanced mutual gaze and empathic eye blinking, whereas indifference or malevolence was associated with lower or suppressed such responses. Together our results suggest that prosocial decision-making is sustained by an intrinsic motivation for social affiliation and controlled through positive and negative vicarious reinforcements.social neuroscience | emotions | social gaze | eye blink | prosocial

Social determinants of eyeblinks in adult male macaques

“…The blink rate of the fourth monkeys was just marginally significant (at 96.4%, where 97.5% is the upper limit of the two-tailed test). Averted gaze, did not cause a similar increase in blink rate in any of the four monkeys, suggesting that direct gaze has a stronger effect on social behavior than averted gaze11 enabling either social avoidance or approach28. This is also consistent with the finding that direct gaze activates, in the amygdala, a set of neurons singularly tuned to eye contact20 and that patients with amygdala damage rarely make eye contact during face-to-face social interactions29.…”

“…The rate and timing of the eyeblinks, however, does not merely reflect the physiological status of the eyes. In both humans and non-human primates, blinking has been linked to cognitive states and to social engagement with conspecifics567891011.…”

New perspectives on the neurophysiology of primate amygdala emerging from the study of naturalistic social behaviors

“…Most importantly, these results pave the way for future experiments that will replace videos with live interactions with conspecifics as already pioneered by a few laboratories. 70,78,81,82 The ideal development would be to implement in the laboratory closed-loop social interactions. The social brain evolved to process social signals and make social decisions in closed-loop interactions—and neural activity monitored under such conditions holds the promise of further exciting discoveries.…”

Emergence and suppression of cooperation by action visibility in transparent games

“…So far, most studies have focused on sequential [47,48] or simultaneous games [49]. One of the main challenges in this field is extending these studies to direct real-time interactions that would entail a broad spectrum of dynamic competitive and cooperative behaviours.…”