1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-0182(98)00186-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rudist formations in mixed siliciclastic-carbonate depositional environments, Upper Cretaceous, Austria: stratigraphy, sedimentology, and models of development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast , the pore and canal system of hippuritids is well adapted for filtering [4]. The pore system acted as a sieve allowing only the finer particles to enter the hippuritid ; this highly modified suspension feeding system permitted hippuritids to prosper in environments exposed to siliciclastic sedimentation [7,9,16,17,18]. …”
Section: The Pore and Canal Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast , the pore and canal system of hippuritids is well adapted for filtering [4]. The pore system acted as a sieve allowing only the finer particles to enter the hippuritid ; this highly modified suspension feeding system permitted hippuritids to prosper in environments exposed to siliciclastic sedimentation [7,9,16,17,18]. …”
Section: The Pore and Canal Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A notable exception has been described by Schumann [22] in Central Oman. In this area, the large shells of Vaccinites vesiculosus (Woodward) form monospecific congregations of large number of individuals, extending over areas up to 100 km', The aggregative habit of hippuritids was expressed in different degrees: from two/three individuals attached together, making a small bouquet, to hundreds of clustered individuals building up large congregations [16,23,17,24,25,26,7,18,27,28 among others] (Plate 11, fig. 3).…”
Section: Hippuritid Shell Form and Growth Habitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although frequently referred to as characteristic Cretaceous reef-builders, the growth fabrics formed by elevator rudist bivalves have been shown to be predominantly sediment-supported (Gill et al 1995;Sanders & Pons 1999). Typical features of rudist formations such as rapid vertical growth associated with sediment baffling, the 30 THOMAS STEUBER production of significant amounts of calcareous sediment by either mechanical or bioerosive breakdown of shells, the lack of bound, waveresistant growth fabrics, as well as the production of large amounts of biodeposits (faeces and pseudofaeces) suggest several feedbacks between these organisms and their environment.…”
Section: Organism-environment Feedbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In environments with low turbulence where these biodeposits were not removed, their accumulation probably induced anoxic conditions at the sediment surface. This precluded the settlement of rudist larvae, and explains why other epibenthic organisms are frequently rare or absent in many rudist communities (Sanders &Pons 1999;Steuber 1999b). The exclusion of other organisms is common in modern mussel beds, and benthic communities are impoverished below suspended cultures of Mytilus on hanging long lines (Asmus 1987).…”
Section: Organism-environment Feedbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation