DOI: 10.4995/thesis/10251/1948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rule-Based Software Verification and Correction.

Abstract: The increasing complexity of software systems has led to the development of sophisticated formal methodologies for verifying and correcting data and programs. In general, establishing whether a program behaves correctly w.r.t. the original programmer's intention or checking the consistency and the correctness of a large set of data are not trivial tasks as witnessed by many case studies which occur in the literature.In this dissertation, we face two challenging problems of verification and correction. Specific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A bottom-up approach has been proposed in (Kanamori and Seki, 1986;Ferri et al, 2001;Leuschel and Massart, 2003). Ballis (2005) claimed that his approach can be applied as a top down or a bottom up approach. All those approaches are driven by (a finite set) positive and negative examples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A bottom-up approach has been proposed in (Kanamori and Seki, 1986;Ferri et al, 2001;Leuschel and Massart, 2003). Ballis (2005) claimed that his approach can be applied as a top down or a bottom up approach. All those approaches are driven by (a finite set) positive and negative examples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework presented here has two major advantages: (i) The positive examples defined in E + are guaranteed to be included both in the meaning of the original program and of the specialized version. Note that in (Ballis, 2005;Alpuente et al, 2001;Bostrom and Idestam-Almquist, 1999), E + consists of a finite set of ground atoms and it is not clear how they handle cases when some positive examples are not included in the original program. (ii) The specialization process is performed according to the positive examples only, no need to negative examples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%