1976
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(76)90229-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rules for the perception of connectivity in random dot patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Texture-discrimination The subject viewed an array of lighted dots presented on a CRT in a rectangular grid (Santoro & Fender, 1976). At the viewing distance of 1 m, the total rectangular array was 6.80 wide and 4.60 high.…”
Section: The Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Texture-discrimination The subject viewed an array of lighted dots presented on a CRT in a rectangular grid (Santoro & Fender, 1976). At the viewing distance of 1 m, the total rectangular array was 6.80 wide and 4.60 high.…”
Section: The Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various textures were generated by manipulating the probability that adjacent dots in the matrix would be illuminated or not. Previous work with these textures (Santoro & Fender, 1976) had identified percepts of granularity (varying from fine to coarse) and of directionality (horizontal, vertical or diagonal). On the basis of this work, specific textures were selected to be discriminated.…”
Section: Perceptual Tests On Visual Displaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 50% contrast neutral gray 2. Texture I, a texture pattern divided into four quadrants (Santoro and Fender, 1976) with a visually different texture in one of the quadrants.…”
Section: The Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%